Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:15:16 -0800 (PST)
On 20 Dez., 20:09, george <gree...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But you really do need to remember that
there ALWAYS WAS, FROM THE BEGINNING,
A DIFFERENT possible resolution of this, namely,
TO DENY THE AXIOM OF FOUNDATION and to declare, from the beginning,
that OF COURSE a set of ALL sets would HAVE to contain itself as a
member.
And this would lead to the well known result that the power set has
not a larger cardinal than the set.
Everybody has to give WM credit for observing that
"ZFC is a theory of every thing except everything".
But eyerything is also a "thing".
Regards, WM
.
- References:
- Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: WM
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- From: george
- Extrapolating linear ratios
- Prev by Date: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Next by Date: Re: WM has a reservation at Hotel Infinity
- Previous by thread: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Next by thread: Re: Extrapolating linear ratios
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|