Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:22:38 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 15, 6:18 am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
What I thought you were saying was that if the completeness theorem
were false, then ZFC would be inconsistent,
I DID say that!
since the completeness
theorem is a theorem of ZFC.
I DID say that!
THAT is TRUE!!
In what sense COULD something "be false" IF it is
TRUE IN ALL MODELS of ZFC?!? Being true in ALL models,
it would therefore necessarily have to be true in the standard model
as well!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- References:
- what follows from denying an axiom
- From: george
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Daryl McCullough
- what follows from denying an axiom
- Prev by Date: Re: The versatility of A = A
- Next by Date: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Previous by thread: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Next by thread: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Index(es):