Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:57:07 -0700, Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@xxxxxxx>
said:
george wrote:
...
Chris Menzel is the first person I have ever heard say "second-order
language".
Would he then be the one who wrote the content of
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-higher-order/
I wish! I did write this one, however:
<shameless plug>
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/actualism
</shameless plug>
:-)
.
- References:
- what follows from denying an axiom
- From: george
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: george
- Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- From: Nam Nguyen
- what follows from denying an axiom
- Prev by Date: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Next by Date: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Previous by thread: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Next by thread: Re: what follows from denying an axiom
- Index(es):