For All x



When we use the quantifier 'For All x' the variable x can range over
all values in the domain under consideration.Does it mean that we know
beforehand what is in the domain and what is not?
As an example, consider a set theory with only two of the usual
axioms :
1) Ez:Ax~x e z ( existence of 0 )
2)Az Ey Ax x e y <-> x e z & 0 e x (specific instance of separation)

This system, at the object level, is agnostic about the existence of
a successor of 0.

If z in axiom 2 can range only over the sets explicitly guaranteed
to
exist by the axiom system without reference to the domain ,then 2)
reduces to
Ey Ax xe y <-> x e 0 & 0 e x , so that y=0.The two axioms , by
themselves can
assert the existence of only the set 0

If the domain is specified beforehand to contain 0, &{S0} , then 2)
can assert the existence of
both 0 (z=0) and {S0} (z={S0})

which of these ways of interpreting 'for all x' , namely x ranging
over sets whose existence
can be proved at the object level, OR x ranging over a pre-specified
domain --is the correct one? shall appreciate a clarification.
-apoorv





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Some basic set theory questions
    ... with me that getting the existence of the empty set from ... using infinity. ... This debate concerns whether the Axiom of Infinity is ... required to prove that the empty set exists. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: "Choosing" the choice relation
    ... deterministic infinite choice is not a problem. ... If determinism is what you crave, ... since you deny the existence of elements you can't specify, ... consider Godel's axiom of infinity (this is different from the ZFC axiom ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Predicativism and natural numbers
    ... > doesn't play much of a role in the acceptance of the existence ... > a set not assumed to satisfy the axiom of induction. ... > induction something we know by "intuition". ... ON THE LINE, or IN THE STRING. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: A probably really silly and kooky idea about set theory.
    ... axiomatize TST using an NF-based theory. ... But NF is based on Stratified Comprehension, ... the existence of both the empty set 0 and the ... it here) concerns this axiom. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why cant such an example be given?
    ... nonconstructive -- it uses the Axiom of Choice to prove the existence ... theory (i.e., conventional set theory minus the Axiom of Choice), ... and without C or the boolean prime ideal theorem or something ...
    (sci.math)