Five Logics to Learn.
- From: eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Science appears the issue. Can logic be considered a true science
now?
First order predicate appears the common gramatical logic in usage.
Struggle with fallacy appears the issue. Many people use FOL without
understadning the meaning of fallacy. A mistaken inference appears
the cost of fallacy.
Struggle with the correct definition of Universal appears to sink
plans for a true science of logical analysis. A correct fallacy free
Universal definition is a foundation to logic as science.
All I can say is that five basic universals form five basic logical
sciences. Each appears fallacy prone except for the old Greek
inference based logic.
Learning all logical science appears the task for many inquiring
minds.
1. FOL - Universal definition, each
Each set becomes a subset of the larger, defines FOL universal
2. Schema- Set
Each set as a defined class becomes a thing symbolically idneifiable.
3. Modal- Russells logic
Each set then allows anothers existance. Set cause to exist was
always a aanother set.
4. Anotative- Set as a symbolic appearance
Symbol as existance frees the user from fallacy, but symbol cause
implies as relative Universal as opposed to a universal absolute. Used
by Russells arch enemy, A special fallacy called the red ball in the
jar appears to always solve fallacy but red as a color denotes the
existance of ball!
5. Old Greek Relative
Relation as set cause to exist implies universal as relation effect.
Fallacy free when used objectively in observable sciences.
I have summaried the five basic logics to learn. Each universal
appears the issue. We need only retort the effect of confusion over
logic as science.
I learned five times, so must all theorectically mature people.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Closed unbounded subset of ordinals
- Next by Date: Re: Usual axioms of set theory and the arguments of consistency
- Previous by thread: Closed unbounded subset of ordinals
- Next by thread: IF ARE NOT IMPORTANT, WHY CHIP-MIND-CONTROLLERS ARE INSISTENT& SECRECY INDUCE?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
