Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:35:18 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 2, 9:57 am, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I hope that this isn't a silly question but what _is_ second-order set
theory?
ZFC with replacement and separation in their second-order form instead
of as schemata.
But is there consensus as to what the logical axioms are?
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- References:
- Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- Prev by Date: Re: For All x
- Next by Date: Re: For All x
- Previous by thread: Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- Next by thread: Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- Index(es):