A historial query regarding Scott's trick
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Mar 2009 16:06:02 +0200
Scott's trick, of replacing equivalence classes modulo R with sets of
the form
{y | xRy and for all z with rank(z) < rank(y), not xRz}
is well-known, and crops up now and then in sci.logic and sci.math,
usually in discussions about cardinality in absence of choice. I
wonder, though, if the trick was first introduced in the ultrapower
construction in Scott's proof that the existence of a measurable
implies that not all sets are constructible?
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A historial query regarding Scott's trick
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: A historial query regarding Scott's trick
- Prev by Date: Godels use of the axiom of reducibility makes his incompleteness theorem invalid
- Next by Date: Re: 2nd order replacement and non-standard models of ZF?
- Previous by thread: Godels use of the axiom of reducibility makes his incompleteness theorem invalid
- Next by thread: Re: A historial query regarding Scott's trick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|