Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:39:29 +0200
Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx> writes:
Come to think of it, this basically amounts to a trivial quantifier
elimination.
Or, in the slapping-of-forehead department, we may simply observe the
theory is countably categorical.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- References:
- non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Ben Crowell
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Gc
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- Prev by Date: Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- Next by Date: Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- Previous by thread: Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- Next by thread: Re: non-Archimedean models of Euclidean geometry?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|