Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- From: Fjodor <frode.bjordal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
I think it would be of tremendous philosophical and mathematical
interest if we could construct a set theory without the transfinite
stuff, i.e. a set theory that could do all the practical mathematics
but either could not prove |P(N)| > |N| or could prove |P(N)| = |N|.
Occam's razor comes to mind.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- From: Newberry
- Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- From: hurburble
- Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- References:
- Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- From: Fjodor
- Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- From: Newberry
- Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's Argument Skolemized?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|