Re: Cranks and errors
- From: Marshall <marshall.spight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
On May 18, 3:44 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've given you all you need to know that with a language with '+' and
'0' and the axiom "Axy x=y" we may derive, with first order logic with
identity, "Axy x+y=0".
See Endertons' logic book or any number of other textbooks on
mathematical logic (or even just read your own copy of Shoenfield
without burdening it with all the extra garbage you demand it say).
Or, if I may be so bold, and without meaning any disrespect,
work it out for one's own self. Can we come up with a model
for that theory in which it is *not* the case that x+y=0? (For
example.) No, we cannot. (I think this completely escapes
Nam's attention, even when it is specifically pointed out.)
Marshall
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: Cranks and errors
- References:
- Cranks and errors
- From: Herbert Newman
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: Cranks and errors
- From: MoeBlee
- Cranks and errors
- Prev by Date: Re: 2nd-order logic in lower-order language
- Next by Date: Re: Cranks and errors
- Previous by thread: Re: Cranks and errors
- Next by thread: Re: Cranks and errors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|