Re: Matheology § 030
 From: Uergil <Uergil@xxxxxxx>
 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:15:45 0600
In article <jqog8u$dtt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"LudovicoVan" <julio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uergil" <Uergil@xxxxxxx> wrote in messageActually, if there are infinitely many of its digits known, or at least
news:Uergil31F923.14460806062012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article<snipped>
<c40f5972029341faba4ed6a6875c9946@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But irrational numbers in fact are not available as sequences of
digits.
0.1234567891011121314151617181920... is an irrational expressed as a
series of digits.
And so is .10100100010000100000...
The sequence of digits does not tell which irrational it is.
knowable, which there are in this case, that tells us exactly which real
it is.

"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Matheology § 030
 From: WM
 Re: Matheology § 030
 From: LudovicoVan
 Re: Matheology § 030
 References:
 Matheology § 030
 From: WM
 Re: Matheology § 030
 From: Uergil
 Re: Matheology § 030
 From: LudovicoVan
 Matheology § 030
 Prev by Date: Re: Matheology § 022
 Next by Date: Re: YAQ from me
 Previous by thread: Re: Matheology § 030
 Next by thread: Re: Matheology § 030
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
