# sci.logic

**Re: Quantifier-free first order logic: restated.**,*George Greene***Re: Quantifier-free first order logic: restated.**,*Zuhair***Re: Quantifier-free first order logic: restated.**,*Zuhair***Re: Quantifier-free first order logic: restated.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Quantifier-free first order logic: restated.**,*Frederick Williams*

**How to Equate a single value to a pair?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: How to Equate a single value to a pair?**,*George Greene***Re: How to Equate a single value to a pair?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: How to Equate a single value to a pair?**,*George Greene*

**LIAR = Godel = “You can’t always get what you want.” (Theory of Perfect Systems)**,*Charlie-Boo***iPhone App To Help You Learn Spanish Faster By Using Flashcards With Pictures**,*gfkvpjrssg***Re: Is Finitary Full FOL equivalent to a particular Infinitary quantifier-free bi-sorted FOL?**,*George Greene***Re: ZFC is Consistent - No Axiom Infers the Negation of Any Axiom**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: WHOOOHOOOO! Symbolic LOGIC in Prolog! <<<<<<<**,*George Greene***Re: GEORGE THE NEW FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTER!**,*George Greene***Re: Is full first order language equivalent to an infinitary quantifier free fist order language?**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Is full first order language equivalent to an infinitary quantifier free fist order language?**,*George Greene*

**Re: LESSON1 - a Brief intro to SETS IN PROLOG**,*George Greene***Re: LESSON1 - a Brief intro to SETS IN PROLOG**,*Graham Cooper*

**Re: MOEBLEE and GEORGE GREENE *CANNOT* answer QUESTIONS!**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: MOEBLEE and GEORGE GREENE *CANNOT* answer QUESTIONS!**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: MOEBLEE and GEORGE GREENE *CANNOT* answer QUESTIONS!**,*George Greene*

**Re: MOEBLEE and GEORGE GREENE *CANNOT* answer QUESTIONS!**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: MOEBLEE and GEORGE GREENE *CANNOT* answer QUESTIONS!**,*George Greene*

**An Infinite Loop Detector is IMPOSSIBLE because...**,*Graham Cooper***Intermediate Accounting Kieso 14th Edition Test Bank and solution manual - is available for sale. buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : bestsellers.testbanks(at)gmail.com.**,*esol42***Old 2003 thread**,*George Greene***Re: Old 2003 thread**,*George Greene***Re: Old 2003 thread**,*MoeBlee*

**Comprehensive Test Banks and solution manuals at affordable prices**,*allsolutionmanuals11*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Comprehensive Test Banks and solution manuals at affordable prices**,*esol42*

**Re: PREDICATE CALCULUS in PROLOG!**,*George Greene***Re: PREDICATE CALCULUS in PROLOG!**,*Graham Cooper***Re: PREDICATE CALCULUS in PROLOG!**,*Graham Cooper*

**Re: A COLLECTION of sets that are not members of themselves**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: A COLLECTION of sets that are not members of themselves**,*George Greene***Re: A COLLECTION of sets that are not members of themselves**,*George Greene*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

*Message not available*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Christopher Menzel*

**Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*George Greene***Re: Does ZFC use an ORACLE to decide what is a Theoerem?**,*MoeBlee*

**cheap jordan shoes online（www.nike-black.com）;**,*www.nike-black.com***Holy Bible - World All Time BEST SELLER**,*BroilJAB***Re: Holy Bible - World All Time BEST SELLER**,*Dan Christensen*

**iPhone App To Help You Learn Chinese (Mandarin) Faster By Using Flashcards With Pictures**,*tbedyyo2ki***Re: Test bank for South Western Federal Taxation 2009 Corporations Partnerships Estates and Trusts**,*alkhelawi92***Re: Comprehensive Test Banks for student**,*alkhelawi92***Re: Comprehensive Test Banks and solution manuals for students All below for $35 only. Email me at instructors.team[at]gmail.com if you need to buy any test bank or solution manual listed below. All emails will be answered quickly. Use (CTRL +**,*alkhelawi92***Re: Comprehensive Test Banks and solution manuals for students Email me at instructors.team[at]gmail.com if you need to buy any test bank or solution manual listed below. All emails will be answered quickly. Use (CTRL + F) to search your**,*alkhelawi92***Re: Global Marketing: Foreign Entry, Local Marketing, and Global Management by Johny K. Johansson 5th Test bank**,*etramo2***Zuhair is too much of a *** to Tackle Anything but TRUE and FALSE**,*Charlie-Boo***Uses of THIS**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Uses of THIS**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Uses of THIS**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Uses of THIS**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Uses of THIS**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Uses of THIS**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Uses of THIS**,*LudovicoVan*

**Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Patricia Shanahan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Patricia Shanahan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Patricia Shanahan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Marshall***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (more complete)**,*MoeBlee*

**Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*George Greene*

**Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*MoeBlee***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox (typos corrected)**,*George Greene*

**Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: Russell's Paradox is not a Paradox**,*George Greene*

**iPhone App To Help You Regain 20/20 Vision Naturally**,*piapkjpicg***Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall**Message not available***Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall**Message not available***Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall**Message not available***Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall***Re: Intuition and Formality**,*Marshall*

**Is Obama Gay?**,*BroilJAB***Is Obama Gay?**,*Marshall*

**Scott and the cumulative hierarchy**,*LauLuna***Re: Scott and the cumulative hierarchy**,*Pierre Asselin*

**The “Proof” of the Liar Paradox is to prove an English statement exists which is neither True nor False**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The “Proof” of the Liar Paradox is to prove an English statement exists which is neither True nor False**,*Dan Christensen***Re: The “Proof” of the Liar Paradox is to prove an English statement exists which is neither True nor False**,*LudovicoVan***Re: The “Proof” of the Liar Paradox is to prove an English statement exists which is neither True nor False**,*Dan Christensen**LudovicoVan**Dan Christensen**Charlie-Boo*

*Dan Christensen**Charlie-Boo**Dan Christensen**Dan Christensen**Charlie-Boo**Dan Christensen**Charlie-Boo*

*Zuhair*

**OT: Re: On the Denier Rationalization "Other Species Went Extinct So It's A-OK for Humans To Go Extinct"**,*Peter Webb***Re: Propositional logic applied to "This statement is FALSE".**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*LudovicoVan*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem minus self-reference**,*|-|erc*

**Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Marshall***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*George Greene***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Frederick Williams*

**Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Timothy Sutter***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Timothy Sutter***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Timothy Sutter***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Timothy Sutter*

*Message not available***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos**Message not available***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*andrewtomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos**Message not available***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*tomazos***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Proof Universe Came From Nothing?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*George Greene***Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*George Greene***Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: The Original Lair Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: The Original Liar Paradox: A Formal Resolution in First-Order Logic**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Formalization of the abstract liar paradox in first order logic.**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Zuhair***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*PeteOlcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene**Message not available***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene*

**Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*George Greene***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The non-Paradoxical answer to Russell's Paradox**,*Peter Olcott*

**Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*PeteOlcott***Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*George Greene***Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*George Greene***Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*George Greene*

**Re: Set of all sets that do not contain themselves**,*George Greene*

**Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*William Elliot***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*William Elliot***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair*

**Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*CubaFAQ***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Zuhair*

**Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*George Greene***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: FOL applied to "This statement is false"**,*Frederick Williams*

**tautology**,*mozejko***Re: tautology**,*Charlie-Boo**Message not available***Re: tautology**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: tautology**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: tautology**,*Frederick Williams***Re: tautology**,*mozejko*

**Why the original Liar paradox is not a paradox. And why the abstract version IS a paradox.**,*Zuhair***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*George Greene***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*George Greene***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*George Greene***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Zuhair***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*George Greene*

**Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*Peter Olcott***Re: The Liar paradox formalized in Propositional logic.**,*George Greene*

**Re: Programming the world wide web 2010, 6e robert w. Sebesta solutions manual**,*akshjain . 100***ANN: Jekejeke Prolog 0.9.5 (runtime console, android version)**,*Jan Burse***Proof of the Double Recursion Theorem by Program Construction**,*Charlie-Boo***Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Zuhair***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Liar paradox formalized in propositional logic!**,*Zuhair*

**Peter Landin Annual Semantics Seminar, 3 December 2012, BCS London: Unifying Theories of programming, Professor Sir Tony Hoare**,*paul . boca***Re: Quines in Combinatory Logic**,*Christopher Menzel***Re: Quines in Combinatory Logic**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Quines in Combinatory Logic**,*Christopher Menzel*

**4165 Solution manuals to Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test Banks to Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering Books - part1**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test Banks to Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering Books - part2**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Math, Statistics and Probability Books - part1**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Math, Statistics and Probability Books - part2**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Physics & Astronomy Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Civil Engineering and Architecture Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Environmental Engineering, Earth and Environmental Sciences Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Industrial Engineering, Business, Accounting, Economics and Finance Books**,*abnew17***4165 Solution manuals & Test banks to Materials Engineering Books**,*abnew17***Is this a lie?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Is this a lie?**,*William Elliot***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Zuhair***Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan*

**Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Is this a lie?**,*LudovicoVan***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Is this a lie?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Is this a lie?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Kubasek - Dynamic Business Law - 2e Test bank is available for purchase at affordable prices. Contact us at bestsellers.testbanks[at[gmail.com to buy it today.**,*allsolutionmanuals11***What Ways Are There to Cover a Plane with Lines & Problems with Peano**,*Charlie-Boo***Comprehensive Test Banks and solution manuals at affordable prices*******,*allsolutionmanuals11***Was Kwatinetz one of Tarski's doctoral students?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Was Kwatinetz one of Tarski's doctoral students?**,*David Libert***Re: Was Kwatinetz one of Tarski's doctoral students?**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: The Liar Paradox Revisited... Again!**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: THE HALTING PROBLEM IS BASED ON AN ERROR SHIFTING FROM TM's TO 3GL FUNCTION CALLS**,*Charlie-Boo***[no subject]**,*Unknown***[no subject]**,*Unknown***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen*

*Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Rotwang***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*david petry***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*LudovicoVan***Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: A Formal Resolution of the (Original) Liar Paradox**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*William Elliot***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Jan Burse***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is the Computing equivalent to |- ?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*Marshall***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*Marshall***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

**Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

**Re: The Halting Problem is based on an ill-formed Question**,*George Greene*

**Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isit possible to find that out?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isit possible to find that out?**,*Frederick Williams*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isit possible to find that out?**,*Nam Nguyen**Marshall**Marshall**Marshall**Nam Nguyen***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isitpossible to find that out?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isitpossible to find that out?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Isitpossible to find that out?**,*Marshall**MoeBlee*

**Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Is it possible to find that out?**,*Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams*

*Message not available***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Is it possible to find that out?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBach Conjecture?Is it possible to find that out?**,*Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Marshall***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBachConjecture?Isit possible to find that out?**,*Frederick Williams**Frederick Williams**Message not available***Re: Are there infinitely many counter examples for the GoldBachConjecture?Is it possible to find that out?**,*Frederick Williams**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Frederick Williams**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen*

*Nam Nguyen**Message not available*

**[FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web**,*Boris 'pi' Piwinger*