# sci.logic

**SOLUTIONS MANUAL: Mechanical Measurements (6th Ed., Beckwith, Marangoni & Lienhard)**,*cartermath13***If atheism is a faith....**,*Bill Taylor***Re: If atheism is a faith....**,*Peter Olcott***Re: If atheism is a faith....**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: If atheism is a faith....**,*Peter Olcott***Re: If atheism is a faith....**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Witnessed SOL: So Expressive!**,*Jack Campin***The Serious Queen**,*Kevin Barry***Re:***and Abrahamic religions**,*Marshall***§ 425 Why Russell's Paradox is irrelevant in mathematics**,*WM***Re: WM is irrelevant in mathematics**,*Bergholt Stuttley Johnson***Re: § 425 Why Russell's Paradox is irrelevant in mathematics**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: Mathematical Relativity (MR) - The End of Absolute Truths in The Concept of The "Natural Numbers"**,*Jamie Barrows*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Mathematical Relativity (MR) - The End of Absolute Truths in The Concept of The "Natural Numbers"**,*Marshall**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Mathematical Relativity (MR) - The End of Absolute Truths in The Concept of The "Natural Numbers"**,*Marshall**Peter Percival**Marshall*

*Message not available**Dan Christensen**Peter Percival**Peter Percival**Dan Christensen**Dan Christensen*

*Rupert**Nam Nguyen**Rupert**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Peter Percival**Nam Nguyen**Jim Burns**Nam Nguyen**Peter Percival**Peter Percival**Jim Burns**Nam Nguyen**Alan Smaill**Nam Nguyen**Peter Percival**Alan Smaill**James Burns**James Burns**Peter Percival**Nam Nguyen**Marshall**Nam Nguyen**Marshall*

*Peter Percival**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen*

*Peter Percival**Martin Shobe**Ben Bacarisse**Nam Nguyen**Martin Shobe**Nam Nguyen**Nam Nguyen**Peter Percival**Nam Nguyen**Martin Shobe**Nam Nguyen**Martin Shobe*

*Rupert**Peter Percival**Nam Nguyen**Rupert**Nam Nguyen**Rupert**Nam Nguyen**Rupert*

**No Gay People In Sochi!!**,*Kevin Barry***Submissive Vs Analytical: Psychiatry's Cure For Paranoid Schizophrenia**,*Kevin Barry***EINSTEIN ET LES RUINES DE L'ESPRIT**,*Pentcho Valev***Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Why Russell's Paradox seems irrelevant in everyday mathematics**,*Peter Olcott*

**What can PA Prove? and Related Questions**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Rupert*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Dan Christensen***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall*

**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Dan Christensen***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall***Re: science and atheism ARE faiths**,*Marshall*

**30% Cannot Ever Matter -- Denier**,*bret . e . cahill***DOPPLER DISPROVES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER DISPROVES EINSTEIN**,*Rupert***Re: DOPPLER DISPROVES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: ZFC & NF in one theory.**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ZFC & NF in one theory.**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: ZFC & NF in one theory.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: ZFC & NF in one theory.**,*Zuhair***Re: ZFC & NF in one theory.**,*Zuhair*

*****s vs Islam**,*Kevin Barry***2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1***Re: 2014 Collection Of Solution Manuals & Test Banks. More Than 15,000 Titles**,*testbankfor1*

**Re: Modelling finite Heyting algebras**,*Marshall***Re: mathematization of quantifiers, Euler's formula, and two paradoxes**,*Charlie-Boo***Under The Dome**,*Kevin Barry***The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Zuhair***Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*fom***Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Zuhair***Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: The informal meaning of ZF-**,*Zuhair*

**MKZ**,*Zuhair***Another formulation of MK: further simplified.**,*Zuhair***the potential outcome ... can be inferred, even if the computer is not run**,*fom***A Little Puzzle**,*Marshall***Re: A Little Puzzle**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Little Puzzle**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*fom***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*fom***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Jack Campin***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Peter Percival***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Jim Burns***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Marshall***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Peter Percival***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Marshall*

**Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Jim Burns***Re: Ping Mr. Nguyen**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: random seed implications on genetics**,*Bill Taylor***Sartre vs VooDoo**,*Kevin Barry***Amazon deal of the day**,*Jack Campin***International Business Directory with Live Chat**,*info . angelance***Another reformulation of MK. nicer notation**,*Zuhair***§ 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Virgil***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Marshall***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Marshall***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Marshall***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*WM***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: § 422 What is a definitionof a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 422 What is a definition of a number?**,*Jack Campin*

**Another reformulation of MK: Correction**,*Zuhair***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Jim Burns***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott*

**Human Resource Management, 14th Ed Mathis Solution manual and test bank is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*esol42***Re: GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY FALSE**,*Pentcho Valev***Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*fom***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*William Elliot***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*William Elliot***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*William Elliot***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*fom***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*fom***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*fom***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*Newberry***Re: Chiswell, Hodges: Mathematical Logic**,*fom*

**Shameless Thuggery**,*Kevin Barry***Another reformulation of MK**,*Zuhair***Re: Another reformulation of MK**,*Zuhair*

**Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Newberry***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Virgil***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Newberry***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Newberry***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Newberry***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Virgil*

**Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why doesn't Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument never fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument rule?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why doesn't Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why doesn't Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why doesn't Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Rupert***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why doesn't Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument RULE?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*George Greene***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*George Greene***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*WM***Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument fail?**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Cardinality revisited!**,*Zuhair***Re: Cardinality revisited!**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Jack Campin***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Albrecht***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Albrecht***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*George Greene***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rupert***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rupert***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rupert***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is a number again?**,*James Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jim Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*James Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*James Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jim Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jim Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jim Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*James Burns***Re: What is a number again?**,*fom***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jack Campin***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rupert***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jack Campin***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jack Campin***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*fom***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Jack Campin***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*fom***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival***Re: What is a number again?**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Marshall***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Rotwang***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: What is a number again?**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again?**,*Dan Christensen*

**LES DERNIERS EINSTEINIENS EN FRANCE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LES DERNIERS EINSTEINIENS EN FRANCE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Brock biology of microorganisms 13th edition Test bank is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*esol42***SPECIAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY FALSE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: SPECIAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY FALSE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: SPECIAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY FALSE**,*Rupert*

**Friendly Introduction To Analysis (2ndEd) - Kosmala - Solutions Manual is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*allsolutionmanuals11*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Friendly Introduction To Analysis (2ndEd) - Kosmala - Solutions Manual is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*allsolutionmanuals11*

**Astronomy today 7th edition eric chaisson instructor resource manual and test bank**,*ckorgange***The Largest Collection of Solution Manuals & Test Banks 2014 Over The Net...!!!**,*testbanklist***Re: The Largest Collection of Solution Manuals & Test Banks 2014 Over The Net...!!!**,*testbanklist*

**Accounting Principles 11th e Edition by Weygandt Kieso solutions manual test bank**,*ckorgange***The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*denzuyar***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*fom***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*Newberry***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*George Greene***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*denzuyar***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*George Greene***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*George Greene***Re: The proof of the halting theorem is not a proof**,*George Greene*

**Correction of a mistake**,*denzuyar***Re: Correction of a mistake**,*denzuyar*

**Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 10th ed Ross test Bank is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*esol42*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 10th ed Ross test Bank is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*allsolutionmanuals11*

**test banks and solution manuals*******,*allsolutionmanuals11***Infantilism vs Being Infantile**,*Kevin Barry***Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**The Pathology of The Jew**,*Kevin Barry***Hypnosis vs Christianity**,*Kevin Barry***Comprehensive test banks and solution manuals for sale**,*esol42***Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Jack Campin***Re: Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Peter Percival***Re: Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Program Synthesis Minimal Programming Construct Puzzle**,*Marshall*

**Three points always belong to a straight line.**,*WM***Re: Three points always belong to a straight line.**,*fom***Re: Three points always belong to a straight line.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Three points always belong to a straight line.**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Three points always belong to a straight line only in WMytheology .**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**String Theory vs The Music Industry**,*Kevin Barry***SOLUTIONS MANUAL: Calculus and its Applications (11th Ed., Larry J Goldstein, Schneider, Lay & Asmar)**,*markrainsun3***Understanding ZFC**,*Zuhair***Re: Understanding ZFC**,*mitch*

**An equivalent of MK.**,*Zuhair***Re: An equivalent of MK.**,*Zuhair***Re: An equivalent of MK.**,*Zuhair*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Marshall**Message not available**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*fom***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*FredJeffries**Message not available**Message not available***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*WM***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Negro vs Black**,*Kevin Barry***Substitution semantics**,*Newberry***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Substitution semantics**,*George Greene***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Newberry***Re: Substitution semantics**,*George Greene***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Newberry***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Marshall***Re: Substitution semantics**,*fom***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Marshall***Re: Substitution semantics**,*fom***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Marshall***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Marshall***Re: Substitution semantics**,*George Greene***Re: Substitution semantics**,*Newberry***Re: Substitution semantics**,*fom*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Newberry***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Percival***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Percival***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*fom***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions) Halting Problem**,*Marshall***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall*

**Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Validating Natural Language Statements (and Mathematical Propositions)**,*Marshall*

**Re: Gentzen's system for ordinal-theoretic consistency strength of PA?**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Gentzen's system for ordinal-theoretic consistency strength of PA?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Gentzen's system for ordinal-theoretic consistency strength of PA?**,*George Greene*

**Analysis with An Introduction to Proof 5th edition Lay Instructors Solution manual is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at[gmail.com.**,*allsolutionmanuals11***Re: ONE disproof of God, again**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*fom***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Peter Olcott*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God. Which One?**,*Peter Olcott*

**Factives (Was: ONE proof of God. Which One?)**,*fom*

**typed vs. untyped math notation**,*Marshall***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Newberry***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Newberry***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Marshall***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Marshall***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Marshall*

**Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*fom***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Marshall*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Newberry***Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Why do we need to know this?**,*Marshall*

**The Parable of a Woman's Desire**,*Kevin Barry***MOVING OBSERVER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: MOVING OBSERVER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: MOVING OBSERVER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: MOVING OBSERVER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Nietzsche vs Philosophy**,*Kevin Barry***Feferman and CH**,*WM***Re: Feferman and CH**,*fom***Re: Feferman and CH**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Feferman and CH**,*fom*

**Matheology § 414**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 414**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**niunian Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: niunian Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Peter Olcott***Re: niunian Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Was For: Fom, from: Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Was For: Fom, from: Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*James Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Marshall***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*George Greene*

**Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*fom***Re: Some misconceptions about the framework known as FOL with identity.**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rotwang***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rotwang***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rotwang***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rotwang***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Jack Campin***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Marshall***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*fom***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Peter Percival***Re: The Invalidity of Godel's Incompleteness Work.**,*Rupert*

**Re: There is no infinite set**,*Albrecht*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: There is no infinite set**,*Albrecht***Re: There is no infinite set**,*George Greene***Re: There is no infinite set**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: There is no infinite set**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: There is no infinite set**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: There is no infinite set**,*Peter Percival*

**A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Zuhair***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Zuhair***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Zuhair***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Peter Percival***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*fom***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*fom***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*fom***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*fom***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: A remedy of my previous claim.**,*fom*

**Re: Any counter-example to this claim?**,*David Libert***A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*George Greene***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Peter Percival***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*George Greene***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Peter Percival***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*George Greene*

**Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*George Greene***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Marshall***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Marshall***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*Peter Percival***Re: A place for Nam's nonsense**,*fom*

**It's Nothing Personal, It's Just Politics**,*Kevin Barry***Re: VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***A PROOF THAT PHYSICS IS DEAD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: A PROOF THAT PHYSICS IS DEAD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Marshall***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Marshall***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Marshall***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Peter Percival***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*George Greene***Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Constructing the Addition, Multiplication and Exponentiation Functions from Peano's Axioms**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*George Greene***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*fom***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*fom***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*fom***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is an extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*fom***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*WM***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Virgil***Re: The set N of the natural numbers**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Albrecht***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Albrecht***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Albrecht***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*George Greene***Re: The set N of the natural numbers is no extensional set**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**THE FALSE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE FALSE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS**,*Pentcho Valev*

**NF+ZF**,*Zuhair***Re: EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (ill-formed statement)**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (ill-formed statement)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (ill-formed statement)**,*Peter Olcott*

**Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*George Greene*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*James Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Jim Burns***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*George Greene***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*George Greene***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hypothesis: Paradox of self-reference such as the Halting Problem is an error of reasoning (IT)**,*fom*

**Re: WMytheology § 413**,*WM***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Michael Klemm**Message not available***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*WM***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Virgil*

*Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*WM***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Michael Klemm***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*WM***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Virgil*

**Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*WM***Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Virgil*

**Re: WMytheology § 413**,*Virgil*

**Re: Matheology § 413**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Matheology § 413**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 413**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 413**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Matheology § 413**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Matheology § 413**,*WM***Re: Matheology § 413**,*Wisely Non-Theist*

**Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*WM*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Marshall***Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*fom***Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*fom***Re: ONE proof of God, again**,*Marshall*