# sci.logic

**EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC THEORY**,*Pentcho Valev***Immediate Survival**,*yahweh411***IS THERMODYNAMICS DEAD ?**,*Pentcho Valev***LARGE set theory!**,*Zuhair***Re: LARGE set theory!**,*William Elliot***Re: LARGE set theory!**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**LARGE set theory.**,*Zuhair***Re: LARGE set theory.**,*Zuhair*

**Large set theory**,*Zuhair***Leadership in Math and Physics**,*Kevin Barry***Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*George Greene***Re: Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*George Greene***Re: Why Is the Set of Distances Assumed to Have a Cardinality of Only Aleph-1?**,*George Greene*

**A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*George Greene***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Alan Smaill***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Peter Percival***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*George Greene***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zuhair***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Alan Smaill*

**Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Jim Burns***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Jim Burns***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Rupert***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Nam Nguyen*

**Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*smn***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*George Greene***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*smn***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*George Greene***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*George Greene***Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: A question about Godel's proof of the first incompleteness theorem**,*X.Y. Newberry*

**Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Wisely Non-Theist***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*George Greene***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*George Greene***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*George Greene*

**Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*George Greene***Re: Is Every Function of a Set a Set?**,*George Greene*

**EINSTEIN KILLED BY DOPPLER**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN KILLED BY DOPPLER**,*Pentcho Valev**Message not available***Re: EINSTEIN KILLED BY DOPPLER**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Einstein ends?**,*Lubomir Vlcek***Completeness?**,*Zuhair***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen*

**Re: Completeness?**,*George Greene***Re: Completeness?**,*Zuhair*

**Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Completeness?**,*Zuhair***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Completeness?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Completeness?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Completeness?**,*Zuhair***Re: Completeness?**,*Nam Nguyen*

**A pure set theory with universal set.**,*Zuhair***Pure set theory with universal set.**,*Zuhair*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Pure set theory with Universal set.**,*Zuhair***Re: Pure set theory with Universal set.**,*Charlie-Boo*

**A pure set theory with universal set!**,*Zuhair***A pure set theory with a universal set.**,*Zuhair***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A criterion for completeness**,*Nam Nguyen*

**Re: ZF Is Missing Specs for What It is Trying to Allow as Sets (4 Questions)**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: ZF Is Missing Specs for What It is Trying to Allow as Sets (4 Questions)**,*Peter Percival*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ZF Is Missing Specs for What It is Trying to Allow as Sets (4 Questions)**,*Dan Christensen***Re: ZF Is Missing Specs for What It is Trying to Allow as Sets (4 Questions)**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Advances in defining mathematics and logic**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Advances in defining mathematics and logic**,*Ross A. Finlayson*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Advances in defining mathematics and logic**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*X.Y. Newberry*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*X.Y. Newberry*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*X.Y. Newberry*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen*

**Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*George Greene***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: New axiom schema to PA**,*Peter Percival*