Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)
From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Ashley Clarke: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Reply: Ashley Clarke: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:50:12 GMT
In article <canhvo02hvc@enews1.newsguy.com>,
Eric Gisin <ericgisin@graffiti.net> wrote:
>Lightning sees everything but good insulators as a conductor.
And it's willing to reconsider its opinion of good insulators at the
slightest excuse, too, having just punched through a couple of kilometers
of a normally-excellent insulator...
"You cannot stop lightning from going where it wants to go. You *can*
offer it a more attractive alternative and hope it takes the bait."
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net
- Next message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Ashley Clarke: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Reply: Ashley Clarke: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
