Re: Tungsten Query
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Pittsburgh Pete: "Re: Kurtsite"
- Previous message: Dave Wilson: "Re: Tungsten Query"
- In reply to: Dave Wilson: "Re: Tungsten Query"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:35:46 -0700
Dave Wilson wrote:
>
> Thank you for all the information so far. I checked out the Plansee
> website and did not find much information. I will contact them to see
> if I can get some useful input and a quote.
>
> Regarding the Bismuth, even though it has a higher atomic number,
> the tungsten has about twice the density. Lead and Tungsten are THE
> materials of choice for radiation shielding in this application.
> Because of design requirements we are limited to tungsten on this
> project. Also, because of the nature of the detectors being used we
> have to use the thin, flat, planar *** and cannot do the shielding
> by stacking material.
>
> So, I'm still looking for information that will point me in the
> direction of tungsten suppliers that can provide the 8 pieces in the
> shapes mentioned, or, flat *** tungsten in .25 and .095 that are
> large enough so we can cut the shapes on a water jet.
Folks you might ask,
<http://www.hightempmetals.com/techdata/hitempTungstendata.php>
http://www.tungstenco.com/
http://www.diamondground.com/
<http://www.espimetals.com/tech/machiningtungsten.pdf>
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Pittsburgh Pete: "Re: Kurtsite"
- Previous message: Dave Wilson: "Re: Tungsten Query"
- In reply to: Dave Wilson: "Re: Tungsten Query"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]