Re: Kurtsite
From: Pittsburgh Pete (metalengr_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: Bill Bowden: "Re: eer"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Kurtsite"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Kurtsite"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Oct 2004 11:45:02 -0700
dad4lou@yahoo.com (Mark) wrote in message news:<bb60bef8.0410182006.64c0fb0e@posting.google.com>...
> Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote in message news:<umjsm05ljjkf4jg912dgtv00iig27n9tus@4ax.com>...
> > On 13 Oct 2004 11:31:55 -0700, thefarmdog@hotmail.com (Brent) wrote:
> >
> > >Does anyone know anything about the metal Kurtsite (i think thats how
> > >its spelled). Aparently its an alloy of lead, aluminum and, zinc.
> > >Its is very wear resistant, and yet still quite slippery.
> >
> > Never heard of it by that name.
> >
> > In the twenties there were a bunch of zinc-based bearing alloys. They
> > seemed to work well, but like the early die-casting alloys they
> > suffered from impurites between the grains (lead being one culprit)
> > and disintegrated after a few years. As a result, they fell from
> > favour.
>
> It's spelled Kirksite and is common material for making molds.
> Google: Results 1 - 10 of about 666 for kirksite. (0.07 seconds)
>
> Mark
Already answered back on Oct 13th. To add a bit more, there is an MSDS
***
http://www.leadcastings.com/msds/kirksite.pdf
giving the composition as Zn with 3.9 to 4.3%Al, and 3.0 to 3.5%Cu.
The copper content is a bit higher than the 2.5 to 3.0% for the "No.2"
die casting alloy, aka AC43A or UNS Z35541, which may also loosely be
referred to as Kirksite by some.
Pittsburgh Pete
------------------------------
DISCLAIMERS
Note: It is understood that this material is intended for general
information only and should not be used in relation to any specific
application without independent examination and verification of its
applicability and suitability by professionally qualified personnel.
Those making use thereof or relying thereon assume all risk and
liability arising from such use or reliance.
We don't believe what we write, and neither should you. Information
furnished to you is for topical (external) use only. This information
may not be worth any more than either a groundhog turd, or what you
paid for it (nothing). The author may not even have been either sane
or sober when he wrote it down. Don't worry, be happy.
- Next message: Bill Bowden: "Re: eer"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Kurtsite"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Kurtsite"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]