Re: New Battery (2000 Wh/kg) with polymer -[C2(NO)2]n- electrode

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 10/29/04 

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:20:16 -0700

Karimi wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> *** Any assistance in research would be considered.
>
> New polymer (poly-nitrosyl-acetylene) is designed to use in solid
> state battery which would have up to 2000 Wh/kg energy storage
> capacity with metals such as Li , Mg , Al ,...
>
> To see the structure of this polymer go to :
> http://www.geocities.com/ismkarimi/xfactor/xfactor5.htm
>
> For more details go to:
> http://www.geocities.com/ismkarimi/xfactor/solidsbattery.htm
>
> *** Some possible polymers which designed to be used as anode (X
> factor) in solid state batteries :
>
> 1) -[C2(NO)2]n- , poly-nitrosyl-acetylene , up to 595Ah ~ 2000 Wh/kg
> 2) -[C2(BO)2]n- , up to 638Ah ~ 2200 Wh/kg
> 3) -[C2(HCO)2]n- , up to 609Ah ~ 2100 Wh/kg
> 4) -[C4(NO)2]n- , up to 470Ah ~ 1640 Wh/kg
> 5) -[=N-(C6H2(NO)2)-HC=]n- , Aromatic , up to 320Ah ~ 1120 Wh/kg
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/batteryxfactor/
>
> If you have any question or idea , contact me.

   1) Said polymers do not exist.
   2) If the did, many of them wouldn't stick around for long.
   3) There is no reason to expect - and lots of reasons not to expect
- they would be reversible as chemically reactive systems.
   4) One could easily maunder about poly(tetranitro-para-xylidiene),
(=C-C6(NO2)4-C=), and get a much bigger wallop in an entirely
obtainable polymer given the same argument. Or poly(trinitrostyrene)
from TNT or polystyrene. Or poly(picryl methacrylate). It would all
still be meaningless real world. 

-- 
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Relevant Pages