Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals
From: jbuch (jbuch_at_CUTHERErevealed.net)
Date: 12/25/04
- Previous message: Ravi: "Conducting Polymers"
- In reply to: BretCahill: "Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 13:06:48 -0600
BretCahill wrote:
> Mark Thorson nospam@sonic.net in
>
>>Message-id: <41CCA17B.D9FCB830@sonic.net> writes:
>>
>>jbuch wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There is little value in attempting to understand what stupid
>>>people hate, and why they hate it..
>>
>>Stick to research, you have NO aptitude for marketing. :-)
>
>
> Someone needs to start working on a more
> user friendly version of Nature.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
>
>
You could certainly begin with yourself as a model for user friendliness
.... See below
> The thermal conductivity of pure metals decreases dramatically with
> temperature.
> The exact opposite happens in alloys.
>
> This is why so many people hate materials science.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
- Previous message: Ravi: "Conducting Polymers"
- In reply to: BretCahill: "Re: Conductivity v Temp In Alloys v Pure Metals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]