Re: denier nylons and their strength...
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 12/28/04
- Previous message: jbuch: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- In reply to: JRK: "denier nylons and their strength..."
- Next in thread: Frank Logullo: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- Reply: Frank Logullo: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:35:36 -0800
JRK wrote:
>
> Pardon my ignorance on this matter. I was hoping I could get some
> explanation of the different strengths and durability of the ballistic
> nylons...I have been told that 1680 is much stronger and more durable
> that 1050. Could anyone verify this?
Your question has been answered in another post. Note that
Spectra/Dyneema UHMW gel-oriented polyethylene outperforms Kevlar both
by weight and considerably by environment. Sweat degrades a Kevlar
vest during acute exposure and progressively over a time.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Previous message: jbuch: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- In reply to: JRK: "denier nylons and their strength..."
- Next in thread: Frank Logullo: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- Reply: Frank Logullo: "Re: denier nylons and their strength..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]