Re: Optimum particle size
- From: lysdexia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 20 Jul 2005 23:23:39 -0700
Uncle Al wrote:
> Maximum packing for monodisperse identical particles is achieved for
> M&Ms. Ultimate packing of a lattice of spheres requires two or three
> sizes - the lattice itself, then filling its octahedral and/or
> tetrahedral holes.
Nope, the maximum packing is by particles that indeed tile space, so
forget round rubbish. Build extended and pointy cell elements by
selective diffraction: http://www.aip.org/pnu/1992/split/pnu094-4.htm.
-Aut
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimum particle size
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Optimum particle size
- References:
- Optimum particle size
- From: Dr. Mike
- Re: Optimum particle size
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Optimum particle size
- From: Dr. Mike
- Re: Optimum particle size
- From: Uncle Al
- Optimum particle size
- Prev by Date: Re: Materials job outlooks?
- Next by Date: Re: Best adhesive to repair phenolic?
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimum particle size
- Next by thread: Re: Optimum particle size
- Index(es):