Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- From: jbuch <jbuch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:45:32 -0500
redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
2. My comments were aimed at the statement, at the website, that CTE was "significantly smaller" for amorphous PTFE. It's odd that their customer could not tolerate the rapid expansion of the original PTFE sample, but just a 15% reduction made everything okay. If they ended up buying this, it's a case of marketing-BS triumphs over objective, measured fact.
Mark
To some individuals, a 15% decrease is "Significantly Smaller".
A third party can make such a claim sound either "rational" or "irratinal" depending upon what side of the bed they got up on.
--
1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins book
4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- References:
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- From: redbelly98
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- From: redbelly98
- Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- Prev by Date: Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- Next by Date: Re: An urgent message for Archimedes Plutonium
- Previous by thread: Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- Next by thread: Re: High thermal expansion coefficient
- Index(es):