Re: history question

Mark Thorson wrote:
jim beam wrote:

is there anything else you know of that sheds a little more light?
i've spent hours on google, but it's mostly propaganda pieces.
anything with a little more meat?


You should be able to reconstruct the history
of this technology from the patent literature,
in as much depth as you want:

http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html

You can start with U.S. Patent 4,297,145, searching
both the patents it references and the patents
which reference it.

thanks mark!
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Rise of the multicore machines
    ... That's the route I took with VZOOM; ... Distributed Proxy Ref-Counting? ... of proxy references there are to an object. ... > I patent it of course). ...
    (comp.programming.threads)
  • Re: CK Patent 6967448
    ... >a new patent granted 25 October 2005.... ... This patent has a longer list of references than I have ever ... therefore in the public domain. ... or use e-mail address listed at the Web site. ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)
  • Re: CK Patent 6967448
    ... >>>From the news briefs at www.ledmagazine.com I saw a notice that CK has ... > This patent has a longer list of references than I have ever ... > someone was paying me my usual consulting fee) it would be ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)
  • Re: history question
    ... i've spent hours on google, but it's mostly propaganda pieces. ... You can start with U.S. Patent 4,297,145, searching ... both the patents it references and the patents ...
    (sci.materials)
  • Re: retroreflector with offset angle?
    ... explanation of modern retroreflector designs ... I believe that this is a reissue of patent number 6767102. ... Following through the references, I found patent numbers ...
    (sci.optics)