Re: Fundamental frequency -- limited resources
From: jim (_at_m.sjedging@mwt.net)
Date: 08/18/04
- Next message: Mike Deskevich: "Re: Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Previous message: Eric: "Re: convolution of lognormals (or other broad distributions)"
- In reply to: Email Unread: "Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Next in thread: Mike Deskevich: "Re: Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:35:50 -0500
Email Unread wrote:
>
>
> So if I had an array of 50,000 elements, which would represent 5
> seconds of data, with most of the samples reading "0", and about 500
> elements reading non-zero when an event occurred. So far, so good....
>
Wouldn't most of your problems disappear if you store the data as the
number of zeroes between events?
If events are on average 500 elements apart you require only 100 word
length data entries to store a record of 50,000 elements.
-jim
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
- Next message: Mike Deskevich: "Re: Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Previous message: Eric: "Re: convolution of lognormals (or other broad distributions)"
- In reply to: Email Unread: "Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Next in thread: Mike Deskevich: "Re: Fundamental frequency -- limited resources"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
