Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis

From: Gerry Thomas (gfthomas_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 10/01/04 

Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:53:16 -0400

"Aardpig" <aardpig@nospam> wrote in message
news:buWdnQBwvfNu4sHcRVn-tw@comcast.com...
> Gerry Thomas wrote:
> > "Peter Spellucci" <spellucci@fb04373.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote
in
> > message news:cjemus$a0k$1@fb04373.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de...
> >
> >>In article <1096468852.988859.208300@k17g2000odb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> mdi00@hotmail.com writes:
> >> >Is there a book of numerical recipes which makes use of object
> >> >oriented programming in C++? The classic "Numerical Recipes in
> >> >C++" hardly makes any use of C++'s OO capabilities, and other
> >> >books I've come across only make very limited use of them.
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >Marco
> >> >
> >>
> >>maybe Daoqi Yang: C++ and object oriented numeric computing
> >>springer publisher 2001, ISBN 0-387-98990-0
> >>is of the intended type
> >>hth
> >>peter
> >
> >
> > I endorse Peter's suggestion. Additionally, if you come from a F77
> > background, Yang's book will promote your transition from FORTRAN to
C++
> > for OO numerics. Also, it's equally good at ignoring f90/95/2003, which
add
> > nothing of significance to OO numerics.
> >
>
> Note to the original poster: I'd be cautious about accepting any advice
> from Gerry Thomas, he's malicous, dishonest, and none too bright to
> boot. Hang around c.l.f or s.m.n-a for a while, and you'll see what I
> mean -- pretty much everyone in these ng's detests the pathetic little
> troll...
>
> Aardpig

Read Daoqi Yang book for yourself and form your own judgment instead of
looking to c.l.f.'s cretinious police for propaganda on matters Fortran or
numerics, they being worth less than a pig's turd which is why Fortran has
long been flushed down the toilet 

-- 
You're Welcome,
Gerry T.
______
"Ah, Klinger, my constant reminder that Darwin was right!." -- Maj Charles
Winchester III, the 4077th M*A*S*H
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis
    ... Yang's book will promote your transition from FORTRAN to ... >> nothing of significance to OO numerics. ... > from Gerry Thomas, he's malicous, dishonest, and none too bright to ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: sin(x) for large x
    ... > Sine code for ANSI C ... > regarding the evaluation of the sin() function for large ... newsgroup that lays claim to all things right in numerics (chortle, ... current Fortran offerings. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Choice of programming language
    ... Fortran 90/95 rather than Fortran 77. ... yep agreed on that - i'm writing some linear algebra applications in java ... There are actually plenty of people who perform numerics in Java. ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)
  • Re: Starting to doubt fortran
    ... For "numerical code" the difference between C and Fortran is only ... No compiler I'm aware of has array bounds checking turned on by ... I think it's particularly pointers what makes C so ... I think that it is practical for numerics to know both C and Fortran ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Is FORTRAN a dying language? (not a troll)
    ... calculations, all in FORTRAN. ... that a programming language should be object oriented etc. etc. ... numerics code as FORTRAN. ... am calculating some integrals in quantum field theory, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)