Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Greg Lindahl (lindahl_at_pbm.com)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: Michael Hosea: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Dec 2004 15:17:50 -0800
In article <41BA2BB2.6060003@telus.net>,
Jentje Goslinga <goslinga@telus.net> wrote:
> Currently this requires two function calls
> between which the all important norm information is truncated
> from 80 bits accuracy to 64 on a PC for example.
Wow. I can't believe anyone would post this to sci.math.num-analysis!
I thought that non-explicit use of extended precision variables was
universally considered to be a dumb idea. If you want explicit use
of extended precision with LAPACK, you need extra functions.
BTW, modern compilers on PCs generally default to using SSE2
instructions on modern PC cpus, hence no more extended precision
unless you ask for it. This became true soon after the Pentium 4 was
released, which was a few years ago.
-- greg
- Next message: Michael Hosea: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]