Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Salvatore (sfilippone_at_uniroma2.it)
Date: 12/11/04
- Next message: Ioannis: "Re: Math is a SIN ! ! ! !"
- Previous message: vjp2.at_at_at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com: "Wavelet PDE Matlab Sought"
- In reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Dec 2004 08:35:24 -0800
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> Ok, it's clear where this use of temporaries comes from. However,
it's
> not clear that dynamic allocation is the best solution. If your
routine
> is called once, with a large dataset, then it could do its own
> alloation. However, if the routine is called a large number of times
> with the same small problem size, then you want to do the allocation
> outside it.
>
> We probably have to take a step back to the application level, and
see
> which routines can be part of a computationally intensive inner loop.
>
If you do write a shell in Fortran 95 it would be easy to have an
optional WORK parameter that allows the user to do his/her own
allocation when needed, and the shell will allocate its own otherwise
before calling the inner code (be it legacy F77 or newly rewritten F95
or whatever).
Cheers
Salvatore
- Next message: Ioannis: "Re: Math is a SIN ! ! ! !"
- Previous message: vjp2.at_at_at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com: "Wavelet PDE Matlab Sought"
- In reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|