Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Roman Werpachowski (_at_theta1.cft.edu.pl)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: John Ashby: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Maybe in reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Gordon Sande: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Gordon Sande: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
On the 16 Dec 2004 08:42:59 -0600, beliavsky@aol.com wrote:
>>>> Can you define something like
>>>>
>>>> struct {
>>>> int *modes;
>>>> int *parts;
>>>> double energy;
>>>> } state;
>>>>
>>>
>>> type :: state
>>> integer, pointer :: modes => null()
>>> integer, pointer :: parts => null()
>>> double precision :: energy
>>> end type state
>>
>>In Fortran 77 ?
>
> No. Fortran 90 or 95.
Since there is no free stable Fortran 95 compiler with optimizing, this
is of no use to me.
-- Roman Werpachowski /--------==============--------\ | http://www.cft.edu.pl/~roman | \--------==============--------/
- Next message: John Ashby: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Maybe in reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Gordon Sande: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Gordon Sande: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|