Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Victor Eijkhout (see.sig_at_for.addy)
Date: 12/19/04
- Next message: Joe Smith: "Re: higher order finite differencing scheme"
- Previous message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Maybe in reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:39:53 -0500
bv <bvoh@Xsdynamix.com> wrote:
> Any prospects on lapack evaluating the queen of non-obviousness, the
> generalized transition operator,
>
> G = (exp(A) - I)/A
>
> if A is, either ill-conditioned or singular.
I don't think it's on the wish list. Point me to some literature of why
and how?
V.
-- email: lastname at cs utk edu homepage: www cs utk edu tilde lastname
- Next message: Joe Smith: "Re: higher order finite differencing scheme"
- Previous message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Maybe in reply to: Victor Eijkhout: "Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
