Re: new to Numerical Recipies
From: David Wilkinson (david_at_wilkinson6337.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Martin Brown: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Previous message: Roman Werpachowski: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- In reply to: Mark Vaughan: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:14:20 +0000
Mark Vaughan wrote:
> David Wilkinson <david@wilkinson6337.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
> news:ct2tco$a8h$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk:
>
>
>>I have only used "NR in Pascal" but have tried a number of the
>>procedures over the years and always found them to work well.
>>This does not include the FFT one so I can't comment on that.
>
>
> is the "NR in Pascal" code you've used from the freeware distribution
> or from the (now out of print) book?
>
> and if you used the code published from the book, did it look any
> more like real Pascal than the truly hideous stuff in the freeware
> collection?
>
>
I use the book, which I have had for a few years and find a very useful
reference and source of procedures I can use in my programs.
I am not an expert on Pascal as a language. I just use it for writing
programs, in its Delphi form. The current Delphi may well differ from
the original definition of the Pascal language in many ways but this
does not matter to me. I would guess that like most programmers I just
use a sub-set of the facilities available in the language. If it works
efficiently then I am happy,whatever it looks like to some relatively
arbitrary criteria.
As an engineer I am trying to do some large number-crunching calculaions
in the CFD field so the criteria for the language are whether it is
close to natural English and therefore easy to write and check and
modify and whether it runs quickly when compiled. Pascal/Delphi has the
advantage that it is strongly typed and has a well-defined syntax and a
very fast compiler. If you can get the code to obey the syntax then it
will probably do what you want it to do.
- Next message: Martin Brown: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Previous message: Roman Werpachowski: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- In reply to: Mark Vaughan: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: new to Numerical Recipies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|