Re: Legendre,Chebychev polynomials
From: G. A. Edgar (edgar_at_math.ohio-state.edu.invalid)
Date: 03/26/05
- Previous message: BEC Charlie: "Re: General complete elliptic integral"
- In reply to: Alex.Lupas: "Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Next in thread: alexandru.lupas_at_ulbsibiu.ro: "Re: Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Reply: alexandru.lupas_at_ulbsibiu.ro: "Re: Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:41:27 -0500
Maybe you need to explain your notation better...
In article <117ac0e5.0503252040.8d0bf2f@posting.google.com>, Alex.Lupas
<alexandru.lupas@ulbsibiu.ro> wrote:
> In the following, let us denote :
> SUM{A_k}:=A_1+A_2+...+A_n ; (n >= 1 )
so SUM{A_k} no longer depends on k?
> P_n(x)=k_n*[(x^2-1)^n]^{(n)} , P_n(1)=1 , be the Legendre polynomial
> having the roots a_1,a_2,...,a_n ;
> U_n(x)=sin((n+1)*arccos(x))/((n+1)*sqrt(1-x^2)) , U_n(1)=1 , be the Chebychev
> polynomial of second kind with the roots
> b_k=cos(k*pi/(n+1)) , k in {1,2,...,n} .
>
> [A.] I need elementary proofs of following identities /if true/:
>
>
> (1) P_n(b_k)=SUM{(b_k)^n *U_n((b_k)^2)}
How can this be if SUM no longer depends on k ??
>
> (2) U_n(a_k)=-SUM{(b_k)^n *U_n(a_k*b_k)}
>
> It's true that
> =======================================
> (1-2) P_n(x)-U_n(x)=SUM{(b_k)^n*U_n(x*b_k)} ??
> =======================================
>
> [B.] Let c_k=cos((2k-1)pi/(2n)) , k in {1,2,...,n}, and denote
>
> Q_{2n}(x):= SUM{ P_n(x^2+(1-x^2)*c_k) } .
>
> It's true that Q_{2n}(x) has only double roots ??
-- G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
- Previous message: BEC Charlie: "Re: General complete elliptic integral"
- In reply to: Alex.Lupas: "Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Next in thread: alexandru.lupas_at_ulbsibiu.ro: "Re: Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Reply: alexandru.lupas_at_ulbsibiu.ro: "Re: Legendre,Chebychev polynomials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]