Re: Optimization Halp!
- From: "Rishi Tandon" <tandon.rishi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2005 04:25:35 -0800
Charlie, the "rate" does not matter in this case. It is assumed not to
be a gravity feed, but that a pump is employed to empty the tanks. So
the important parameter here is not so much the time, but the amount of
mass removed (rate does not matter, we may take it to be any constant
value).
you said "Maximum length of time interval is thus obtained by
pushing initial state to as far extramum as possible, and draining the
appropriate tank until c-o-g reaches the opposite extremum." That is
true for each individual step only. To proe that for a sum of steps is
the difficult part.
I understand your "Sacrifice" answer, and I am close to
proving/disproving it mathematically. God help me I need to as the
deadline draws evercloser.
Thank you, will let the proof (hoping i get it) be known on the group.
Rishi
.
- Prev by Date: Re: using downhill simplex routine from 'numerical recipes'
- Next by Date: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Previous by thread: A question on Newton's Method
- Next by thread: Re: Time Series Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
