Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: beliavsky@xxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Mar 2005 17:39:05 -0800
Jon Harrop wrote:
> David M wrote:
> > FORTRAN is the
> > language I'm using since its easier then some of the others out
> > there
>
> If you're just starting out then I recommend you use a more
appropriate
> language, like Mathematica (commercial) or OCaml (free). Both of
these
> languages let you concentrate on the problem at hand, rather than
having to
> mess about with computer-specific problems. They are also much easier
to
> learn and use and they will allow you to solve much more difficult
and
> interesting problems.
Fortran 95 is a good language to learn the imperative (procedural)
style of programming for numerical work, with a few elements of
functional programming (pure and elemental functions) thrown in. The
g95 compiler http://www.g95.org is free .
What "computer-specific problems" do you avoid by using OCaml instead
of Fortran? Do you mean "platform-specific"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- References:
- A question on Newton's Method
- From: David M
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Jon Harrop
- A question on Newton's Method
- Prev by Date: Re: Time Series Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Previous by thread: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Next by thread: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|