Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:31:41 -0600
"Jon Harrop" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42500867$0$63445$ed2e19e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What is Lisp-like about Mathematica and OCaml?
They are equally incomprehensible.
> Yes it does:
> In[1]:= f[x_] = x^3 - x - 1
> Out[1]= -1 - x + x^3
> In[2]:= D[f[x], x]
> Out[2]= -1 + 3 x^2
No, the right context is:
f[x_] := x^3-x-1
fp[x_] := D[f[x],x]
Plot[fp,{x,-1,2}]
Which, unless they changed Mathematica recently, doesn't
do anything useful.
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- References:
- A question on Newton's Method
- From: David M
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: beliavsky
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Roman Werpachowski
- Re: A question on Newton's Method
- From: Jon Harrop
- A question on Newton's Method
- Prev by Date: Re: can somebody verify this C program which calls dsaupd_ ? (longish)
- Next by Date: Re: General complete elliptic integral
- Previous by thread: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Next by thread: Re: A question on Newton's Method
- Index(es):