terrible mathematica bug ( //N ) but WHY??
- From: "symbio" <symbio@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:50:02 GMT
Evaluating (using //N) two exact same expressions, gives wrong answer unless
fullsimplify is used first, I spent 2 days on a problem thinking my answer
was wrong, but turned out Mathematica 5 was giving me buggy answers, I
debugged it to this point, but WHY in the world is this happening? Please
help!!!
cut and paste below to see the test case:
In[243]:=
\!\(\(Cosh[\(43\ \[Pi]\)\/\@2] + \((1 - Cosh[43\ \@2\ \[Pi]])\)\ Csch[
43\ \@2\ \[Pi]]\ Sinh[\(43\ \[Pi]\)\/\@2] // FullSimplify\) //
N\[IndentingNewLine]
Cosh[\(43\ \[Pi]\)\/\@2] + \((1 - Cosh[43\ \@2\ \[Pi]])\)\ Csch[
43\ \@2\ \[Pi]]\ Sinh[\(43\ \[Pi]\)\/\@2] // N\)
Out[243]=
\!\(6.551787517854307`*^-42\)
Out[244]=
\!\(\(-1.9342813113834067`*^25\)\)
thanks,
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Why I am unwilling to use Mathematica if I can help it
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: terrible mathematica bug ( //N ) but WHY??
- From: Dana
- Why I am unwilling to use Mathematica if I can help it
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple question: Cholesky factorisation of correlation matrix same as LU?
- Next by Date: ACCPM Compilation Problems
- Previous by thread: Simple question: Cholesky factorisation of correlation matrix same as LU?
- Next by thread: Re: terrible mathematica bug ( //N ) but WHY??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|