Re: DDASPK problem


"bv" <bvoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4314AF45.A5818871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Konstantinos Tseronis wrote:
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I am using Intel Fortran Compiler 8.
>
> Oops, a crucial detail, you're using a work-in-progress compiler
> unsuitable for serious work, unless living dangerously is your thing. In
> short, your problem is likely with the compiler rather than with a
> reasonably robust, albeit far from perfect, "daspk" code.
>
> ---
> bv
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Applied Algorithms http://sdynamix.com
>

Is Intel Version 9 better? As a Digital Visual Fortran user I've been
e-mailed an attractive upgrade offer (download, so no CD, no printed
documentation), as far as price goes - but if it's a retrograde step then
I'll stay with DVF until .NET or Linux support becomes more pressing.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: gfortran binaries from 64 to 32 bit
    ... gemini), compiled with intel fortran compiler. ... have compiled using gfortran. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: gfortran binaries from 64 to 32 bit
    ... gemini), compiled with intel fortran compiler. ... have compiled using gfortran. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: *** glibc detected *** problem
    ... > I've compiled a meteorological model using Intel Fortran Compiler ... It means that there was some kind of memory corruption, ... end of malloced buffer, double free, freeing something ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Bus error/ segmentation fault--help?
    ... When I compile with the intel fortran compiler, ... This subroutine integrates the function y3 up one step, ... implicit double precision (a-h, o-z) ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: DDASPK problem
    ... Oops, a crucial detail, you're using a work-in-progress compiler ...
    (sci.math.num-analysis)