Re: Mathematica. A big limit of mathematica !!!???
- From: LumisROB <lumisrob_NOGOOD_@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:42:48 GMT
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:09:38 +0200, DP <pfennige@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Do you realize that 10^8 elements should be generated in the table, each
>element needing several bytes, because the dot after the "3"
>means that you want floating point numbers? Just storing
>m will require at least several Gigabyte memory.
>Do you have such a computer? Probably not since Mathematica already
>told you "No more memory available".
>
>But this effort appears unnecessary because in your case your final
>result should be exactly 0. Indeed the matrix m is a sum
>of matrix with identical rows and a matrix with identical columns:
>in such a case only 1 or 2-dimensional matrices may have
>non-zero determinant since the spanned vector space is 2-dimensional.
>
>
HI DP
No I regret but with few simple accounts (ByteCounts[1.0] ) you can
calculate that they are necessary around 1.6 GB for m
Certainly that mathematica say that it doesn't have memory but the
true problem is because this happens in a numerical problem whose
resources are enough for other programs what Matlab, Maple...
Cheers
Roberto
.
- References:
- Mathematica. A big limit of mathematica !!!???
- From: LumisROB
- Re: Mathematica. A big limit of mathematica !!!???
- From: DP
- Mathematica. A big limit of mathematica !!!???
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I Draw a Large Number Out of a Hat Digit-By-Digit
- Next by Date: Re: How do I Draw a Large Number Out of a Hat Digit-By-Digit
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica. A big limit of mathematica !!!???
- Next by thread: New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 12, 2005
- Index(es):