sci.math.num-analysis

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Finding eigenvectors of large matricies
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Finding eigenvectors of large matricies
  • From: Sam Mason
• Re: Numerical Recipes in C: Error in numerical derivatives
  • From: Charles Russell
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 31, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: finding eigenvalues :
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: finding eigenvalues :
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: finding eigenvalues :
  • From: Thomas Schmelzer
• finding eigenvalues :
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: searching a nearly sorted list
  • From: robin
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: Is Francis (inventor of QR algorithm) still alive?
  • From: Hugo Pfoertner
• Is Francis (inventor of QR algorithm) still alive?
  • From: Zeke Zeng
• Re: Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: Dave Rusin
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: Analytic function always Lipschitz ?
  • From: Bart Killam
• QR algorithm with explicit shifts
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: linq936
• Re: a very simple problem !!! solving a system of PDE's
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: searching a nearly sorted list
  • From: Roy Stogner
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: linq936
• Re: searching a nearly sorted list
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: searching a nearly sorted list
  • From: John Herman
• Re: indexing complex numbers in a vector
  • From: bland
• Re: Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: Jan Willem
• searching a nearly sorted list
  • From: GeniousFayaz
• Re: Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: Jan Willem
• Re: a very simple problem !!! solving a system of PDE's
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: A question about unimodularity
  • From: mehmet gumus
• Re: Analytic function always Lipschitz ?
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: linq936
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: linq936
• Re: Analytic function always Lipschitz ?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• a very simple problem !!! solving a system of PDE's
  • From: Reza Dini
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Analytic function always Lipschitz ?
  • From: Bart Killam
• Re: indexing complex numbers in a vector
  • From: yakir gagnon
• indexing complex numbers in a vector
  • From: yakir gagnon
• A question about unimodularity
  • From: mehmet gumus
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: how to model this in linear program
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• how to model this in linear program
  • From: linq936
• Re: Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: Dave Rusin
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: David Wilkinson
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: DP
• Non-linear boundary problem
  • From: Jan Willem
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Matrix library
  • From: Harmonic Software
• Re: quadratic programming software
  • From: Harmonic Software
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Axel Vogt
• Re: Eigenvalue buckling problem
  • From: JF
• Re: Matrix library
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Matrix library
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Eigenvalue buckling problem
  • From: Gordon
• Eigenvalue buckling problem
  • From: JF
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: George Marsaglia
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: George Marsaglia
• Re: f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Uwe Schmitt
• Re: Optimization Algorithm
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Uniform point picking on a hexagon
  • From: Olw
• f(x)=x^4+... , Integral[f, [-1,1]]= ?
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: Optimization Algorithm
  • From: JZ
• Re: chi square
  • From: Sami
• Re: quadratic programming software
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• quadratic programming software
  • From: Ajar
• Re: Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: chi square
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: carmaboy
• chi square
  • From: Sami
• Re: Optimization Algorithm
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 24, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Re: about c++ and boundary condition
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: sztrprszkolwia
• Re: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: israel
• Re: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: Benjamin Wüthrich
• Re: Higher order derivatives of Bessel functions
  • From: zubin
• Re: photon torpedo
  • From: Matt Caspper
• Re: Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Dima
• Re: Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Solving Sigma Equation
  • From: carmaboy
• Optimization Algorithm
  • From: JZ
• new attempt
  • From: Hagen Thom
• Re: Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• ARPACK and Arnoldi process and no shifts could be applied
  • From: H.S.
• A question about continuous derivatives
  • From: mike
• Re: about c++ and boundary condition
  • From: wakun
• Re: cradau package problem
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Visualizing 2D data with confidence intervall/standard deviation
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• about c++ and boundary condition
  • From: wakun
• Re: Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Rusty
• Re: Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Internal representation of a floating point number
  • From: Tom
• Re: a non-smooth optimization problem
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: IMSL <-> NAG <-> NR <-> others ?
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Harmonic Software
• Re: Recommend please : free math library
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: Recommend please : free math library
  • From: linq936
• a non-smooth optimization problem
  • From: Hagen Thom
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: Correction for: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Correction for: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: mike
• Re: Question in PCA - Differentiating problem
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Question in PCA - Differentiating problem
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Recommend please : free math library
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Question in PCA - Differentiating problem
  • From: Gol Yass
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Testing matrix solvers (fem)
  • From: vepeke
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Recommend please : free math library
  • From: linq936
• Recommend please : free math library
  • From: linq936
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Fijoy George
• Interpolating function with two important characteristics
  • From: mike
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Testing matrix solvers (fem)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Differential equation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• IMSL <-> NAG <-> NR <-> others ?
  • From: Bertrand Meltz
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Optimization
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Testing matrix solvers (fem)
  • From: vepeke
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Differential equation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Differential equation
  • From: Michele
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: DAE help
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• DAE help
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Optimization
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Galerkin method
  • From: j . r . kelly
• Re: Differential equation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Differential equation
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Randall
• Differential equation
  • From: Michele
• Re: Optimization
  • From: kia
• Re: Optimization
  • From: Erwin Kalvelagen
• Re: Optimization
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Optimization
  • From: Fijoy George
• Re: PDE library in C
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Richard Mathar
• Re: PDE library in C
  • From: carlos
• Re: Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Allen
• Re: Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: decompostion of a product of two primes
  • From: Hugo Pfoertner
• Re: PDE library in C
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: decompostion of a product of two primes
  • From: Antonio Castelló
• Lapack++, CPPLapack, and TNT
  • From: rsina
• Re: Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Allen
• Euler angles and rotation matrices revisited...
  • From: Allen
• Re: cradau package problem
  • From: Mark B Stucky
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Alan
• Re: Visualizing 2D data with confidence intervall/standard deviation
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: cradau package problem
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: cradau package problem
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Visualizing 2D data with confidence intervall/standard deviation
  • From: Jens Müller
• cradau package problem
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Galerkin method
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• PDE library in C
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Galerkin method
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Galerkin method
  • From: BemusedbyQM
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• Galerkin method
  • From: j . r . kelly
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Axel Vogt
• Re: Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: neil.toronto@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Alan
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• 3D FFT ocx library
  • From: Werner G
• Re: orthonormal basis function
  • From: sreejith
• integration by using matlab trapz function
  • From: yoxes
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Martin Brown
• Re: A C compiler for numerical work
  • From: jacob navia
• A C compiler for numerical work
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Need eigensolver that produces good clean rigid-body modes
  • From: Kevin
• Re: Need eigensolver that produces good clean rigid-body modes
  • From: Kevin
• Re: orthonormal basis function
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• orthonormal basis function
  • From: sreejith
• Re: DG for stokes
  • From: sreejith
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Sudarshan Raghunathan
• Re: Moderately extended precision
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 10, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• BEWARE OF Linda West (925) 876-7441 of CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES/Caton Mayflower Moving & Storage
  • From: teckard
• Re: non-linear system solving for non square matrix
  • From: carlos
• Re: non-linear system solving for non square matrix
  • From: Ivan Oseledets
• Re: Confluent hypergeometric function of 1 2 0.5
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Confluent hypergeometric function of 1 2 0.5
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Confluent hypergeometric function of 1 2 0.5
  • From: Axel Vogt
• Re: Creating a movie file from a set of postscript files.
  • From: Peter Salzman
• Re: Solving a PDE as one big ODE
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Solving a PDE as one big ODE
  • From: andy2O
• A C compiler for numerical work
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Solving a PDE as one big ODE
  • From: Dave Rudolf
• Moderately extended precision
  • From: Alan
• Re: matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: Paul Victor Birke
• Re: Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: neil.toronto@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: SOR & Hilbert matrix
  • From: davor . menon
• Re: Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: neil.toronto@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: Rusty
• Re: Help with eigenvalue decomposition
  • From: Amit Singh
• Matrix gradient involving Frobenius norm (and exponential)
  • From: neil . toronto
• Re: matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: Victor Eijkhout
• Re: Help with eigenvalue decomposition
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: Rusty
• Re: matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• matrix inversion in hardware
  • From: rafaelcns
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Jim
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Help with eigenvalue decomposition
  • From: Sumit Mitra
• Re: Help with eigenvalue decomposition
  • From: Sumit Mitra
• Re: Testing a random number generator's period?
  • From: John Herman
• Help with eigenvalue decomposition
  • From: Amit Singh
• Re: Suggestion of numerical method for Coupled ODEs
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Solving a Minimax problem
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Suggestion of numerical method for Coupled ODEs
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Adaptime step size in Monte Carlo methods
  • From: Niels L Ellegaard
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Solving a Minimax problem
  • From: VINOD
• blas1 man page
  • From: wax
• Suggestion of numerical method for Coupled ODEs
  • From: Hsuan-Yeh Chang
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: bv
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: bv
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Numerical Recipes in C: Error in numerical derivatives
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: density function from characteristic function
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Testing a random number generator's period?
  • From: Shi Jin
• Re: Efficient Computation of Stirling Numbers
  • From: Nico Temme
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• Re: linear equation problems
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Normal (Distribution) Approximation
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Higher order derivatives of Bessel functions
  • From: Phil Hobbs
• Re: Normal (Distribution) Approximation
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Normal (Distribution) Approximation
  • From: ChiChiRuiz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• linear equation problems
  • From: russiandon
• linear equation problems
  • From: russiandon
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Numerical Recipes in C: Error in numerical derivatives
  • From: Gordon
• oscillations when solving nonlinear system
  • From: Andreas Schulze
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• density function from characteristic function
  • From: Gabriel Cardi
• Re: Numerical Recipes in C: Error in numerical derivatives
  • From: Rusty
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Higher order derivatives of Bessel functions
  • From: Julian
• Re: Efficient non-symmetric sparse system solver
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: Efficient non-symmetric sparse system solver
  • From: Roy Stogner
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Efficient non-symmetric sparse system solver
  • From: Gautier Write-only
• Re: Efficient non-symmetric sparse system solver
  • From: Sudarshan Raghunathan
• Efficient non-symmetric sparse system solver
  • From: puristi
• Re: Fast Processors for Matrix Inversion
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• Re: Higher order derivatives of Bessel functions
  • From: Robert Israel
• Higher order derivatives of Bessel functions
  • From: Julian
• Re: Fast Processors for Matrix Inversion
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Fast Processors for Matrix Inversion
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Erratum in Goldberg's 1991 FPN survey?
  • From: kj
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: Fast Processors for Matrix Inversion
  • From: George Sfantos
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Allen McIntosh
• Re: Calculating Polynomial coefficients
  • From: Dana
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Comparing floats with fcmp
  • From: kj
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Allen McIntosh
• Re: Calculating Polynomial coefficients
  • From: John Herman
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Fast Processors for Matrix Inversion
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Evaluation of hermite polynomals
  • From: Richard Mathar
• Huge speed difference between sparse A*x and A'*b
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Finding minimum roots (quickly and with minimal branching)
  • From: Tom Holden
• Re: derivative of discrete fourier transform interpolation
  • From: Rusty
• Re: Conjugate gradient reparameterization to impose positivity
  • From: spasmous
• Re: derivative of discrete fourier transform interpolation
  • From: stevenj
• Re: ODE and tri-diagonal system
  • From: bv

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)