Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- From: "Dave Dodson" <dave_and_darla@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 22:31:23 -0700
David W. Cantrell wrote:
And, Dave, I would have thought it would be more precisely described as
a _Gaussian_ integer. For example, according to Mathematica,
In[1]:= IntegerPart[3.1 - 2.5 I]
Out[1]= 3 - 2 I
which seems reasonable to me.
It doesn't seem reasonable to me. I think that the integer part of
anything should be an integer period.
Dave
.
- References:
- New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- From: Mohamed Al-Dabbagh
- Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- From: Dave Dodson
- Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- From: Mohamed Al-Dabbagh
- Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- From: David W . Cantrell
- New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- Prev by Date: Re: is there C code available for computing 2F1 (complex case) ?
- Next by Date: Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- Previous by thread: Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- Next by thread: Re: New Analytical Functions - Numerically Verified
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|