sci.math.num-analysis

• Thread Index

---

• Re: German discovers longest prime number
  • From: Richard Mathar
• Re: Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Nye
• Re: Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Nye
• Re: sci.math.num-analysis: Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: generating a sample value
  • From: john2
• convergence rate of Incomplete Cholesy Conjugate Gradient
  • From: Andreas Stahel
• Re: Initial Conditions for DASKR
  • From: gurry
• Re: German discovers longest prime number
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: German discovers longest prime number
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Preconditioning and regularization example
  • From: aus_fas
• Re: opinions on software for solving elliptic equations
  • From: Roy Stogner
• opinions on software for solving elliptic equations
  • From: Zhang Lei
• opinions on software for solving elliptic equations
  • From: Zhang Lei
• generating a sample value
  • From: Darius
• Re: qfloat extended precision in Cephes library
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: Peter Luschny
• Re: sci.math.num-analysis: Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Martin Brown
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Do you hate china?
  • From: cuthad@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Initial Conditions for DASKR
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: Initial Conditions for DASKR
  • From: gurry
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: Peter L. Montgomery
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: lcw1964
• (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: B Thomas
• qfloat extended precision in Cephes library
  • From: lcw1964
• Re: Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Robert Israel
• sci.math.num-analysis: Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Ian Gay
• low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Nye
• Is Runge-Kutta method still valid for this type of ODE?
  • From: Nye
• Initial Conditions for DASKR
  • From: gurry
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steven Lord
• Larger fuzzy system of linear equation
  • From: blue_maxwell2304
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Is it possible to solve this complex equation?
  • From: Jean-Pierre Merlet
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: is there a relation for all the residues?
  • From: Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• ? householder orth
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: HELP
  • From: Badger
• HELP
  • From: sonhadorPR
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steven Lord
• Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
  • From: Darius
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steven Lord
• Re: Hyperbolic PDE, FV codes unstructured needed
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 28, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: check zero
  • From: Keith A. Lewis
• Hola
  • From: medallita
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steven Lord
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: jan
• Re: HMM applied
  • From: John Herman
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Re: HMM applied
  • From: Mario
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: efficient algorithm for minimal distance pair match
  • From: amgammel
• should i made any adjustment in the CET function when the export is zero.
  • From: wzt
• Re: use of CONOPT help
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Zeke Zeng
• Re: efficient algorithm for minimal distance pair match
  • From: KnowSpamn
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: David Langevin
• Hyperbolic PDE, FV codes unstructured needed
  • From: Zadig
• Locally conservative schemes in conservation laws.
  • From: Zadig
• efficient algorithm for minimal distance pair match
  • From: amgammel
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: David Langevin
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: David Langevin
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Re: SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: john2
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• SVD and repeat singular values
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: use of CONOPT help
  • From: ays
• HMM applied
  • From: Mario
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: David Langevin
• Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• modelling event occurance
  • From: maxndaisy
• Re: use of CONOPT help
  • From: A . L .
• use of CONOPT help
  • From: ays
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Complex polynomial roots of order 60
  • From: pezuc
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Zeke Zeng
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Complex polynomial roots of order 60
  • From: Zdeněk Hurák
• Re: Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: LU Matrix Factorization question?
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Are there multiple roots?
  • From: Zeke Zeng
• Re: LU Matrix Factorization question?
  • From: dcorbit
• decompose using discrete wavelet
  • From: mottmott
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: carlos
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: Abhishek
• LU Matrix Factorization question?
  • From: Susan Margulies
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: carlos
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: Abhishek
• Re: Complex polynomial roots of order 60
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: John Ashby
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Nag
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Nag
• Complex polynomial roots of order 60
  • From: pezuc
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 21, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: John Ashby
• Re: Solve/NSolve
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: Solve/NSolve
  • From: wen . jau . lee
• Solve/NSolve
  • From: wen . jau . lee
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Who has this AAAI 1993 paper?
  • From: lindberg
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• CompletePolish
  • From: John Herman
• How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Nag
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Nag
• related to group theory
  • From: anilkumar . iitm
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Nag
• monotone matrixes & maximum prinziple
  • From: friedo
• Re: confluent hypergeometric function of the 1st kind
  • From: Peter
• confluent hypergeometric function of the 1st kind
  • From: Munir Bhatti
• UMFPACK, Ax = b, A singular and under-determined?
  • From: Susan Margulies
• Re: The QZ method presented in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: The QZ method presented in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: The QZ method presented in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Singular Value Decomposition
  • From: Jakob T
• Re: Singular Value Decomposition
  • From: Jakob T
• Re: The QZ method presented in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Singular Value Decomposition
  • From: Jakob T
• The QZ method presented in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Workshop on Optimisation, Stochastic Programming & Portfolio Planning
  • From: OptiRisk
• Singular Value Decomposition
  • From: Uwe Schmitt
• Singular Value Decomposition
  • From: Jakob T
• Re: ? numerical diff
  • From: Martin Brown
• Matlab fminunc just one iteration. Why?
  • From: msms
• Re: ? numerical diff
  • From: Grave Digger
• Stability of NR Gauss-Hermite algorithm in Excel/VBA?
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: averaging technique
  • From: hoe
• averaging technique
  • From: kkrish
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 14, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• contour integration non uniform grid
  • From: michael . guyonnet
• Need help
  • From: alamshawn
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Axel Vogt
• Bio-TERROR in America: Aerosols for HARM and Torture
  • From: nano4designs
• Re: Geometry
  • From: Danilo
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Geometry
  • From: A . L .
• Geometry
  • From: Danilo
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Nico Temme
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Nico Temme
• Re: Sparse matrix approximation
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Looking to Model a Sinusoid Input/Output
  • From: jasen
• Re: Help with second order interpolation
  • From: jasen
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: jasen
• Re: Sparse matrix approximation
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Sparse matrix approximation
  • From: Helmut Jarausch
• Sparse matrix approximation
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Help with second order interpolation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: carlos
• Re: Taylor series for matrix approximation
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Re: Help with second order interpolation
  • From: stephen
• Re: givens transformations and complex vectors
  • From: Helmut Jarausch
• givens transformations and complex vectors
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• problems on estimating multivariate normal distribution by MLE
  • From: berlinerpils
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: carlos
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: mhill37
• Re: Taylor series for matrix approximation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: tsilva
• Re: Looking to Model a Sinusoid Input/Output
  • From: MatthewCage
• Re: Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: carlos
• Quartic Equation Solver
  • From: mhill37
• Taylor series for matrix approximation
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: carlos
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Russ . Dilley
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Jean-Pierre Merlet
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Everett M. Greene
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Peter
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: carlos
• Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Creating an matrix of possible combinations
  • From: Russ . Dilley
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Fred J. Tydeman
• Re: Looking to Model a Sinusoid Input/Output
  • From: Phil Hobbs
• Help for Eigenmath
  • From: rdp1710@xxxxxxxxx
• Dimensionless Navier-Stokes
  • From: Oliver Ruebenkoenig
• Looking to Model a Sinusoid Input/Output
  • From: whatever . I . fear
• Re: OT arbitrary dimension array for math
  • From: dimitri . ognibene
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: carlos
• Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
  • From: axlq
• Integration from known partial derivatives in a box
  • From: Brian German
• Re: matrix inverse
  • From: spasmous
• Re: check zero
  • From: Ioannis
• Re: check zero
  • From: darknails@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT arbitrary dimension array for math
  • From: Roy Stogner
• Re: check zero
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• check zero
  • From: darknails@xxxxxxxxx
• the generalized eigenvalue problem
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: affine transformation between two triangles
  • From: John
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 07, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Chute Design - DEM
  • From: cumali
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Andreas
• Re: affine transformation between two triangles
  • From: jasen
• Current "best practise" with differentiation??
  • From: Phil Scadden
• Re: affine transformation between two triangles
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• affine transformation between two triangles
  • From: John
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: Mike R
• Re: Help with second order interpolation
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: jdturner
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: matrix inverse
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Help with second order interpolation
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Help with second order interpolation
  • From: stephen
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: rjmagyar
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: A . L .
• Re: parameter estimation
  • From: Evgenii Rudnyi
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: C W
• Re: quasi monte carlo integration:error bound(total variation, vitali's sense)
  • From: Bart
• Chebyshev-Gauss Differentioation
  • From: Adam
• Re: multigrid preconditioning for GMRES
  • From: Helmut Jarausch
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: Ronald Bruck
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: rjmagyar
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: rjmagyar
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: rjmagyar
• Re: eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: Gordon Sande
• eigenvalue problem : M v + p = lam v
  • From: rjmagyar
• KKT Conditions for HS34 Problem
  • From: Ryan Wallace
• KKT Conditions for HS34 Problem
  • From: Ryan Wallace
• parameter estimation
  • From: Darius Blaszijk
• July articles on scientificcomputing.blogspot.com
  • From: scientificcomputingnews
• quasi monte carlo integration:error bound(total variation, vitali's sense)
  • From: matho-frank
• multigrid preconditioning for GMRES
  • From: Chris
• Re: matrix inverse
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: finding optimal combination of matrices
  • From: Soeren Meyer-Eppler
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Luciano
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Evgenii Rudnyi
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• Re: matrix inverse
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• Re: Chebyshev help
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• matrix inverse
  • From: asdf
• Re: symmetric tridiagonal eigenproblem
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Number Theory
  • From: jasen
• Re: least squares error ellipse
  • From: jasen
• Re: Number Theory
  • From: Dave Rusin
• ? numerical diff
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Numerical Recipes in C miser
  • From: schouwla
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: bv
• Re: finding optimal combination of matrices
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Chebyshev help
  • From: carlos
• Re: Chebyshev help
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Chebyshev help
  • From: carlos
• Chebyshev help
  • From: pconte00
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Mark Vaughan
• Number Theory
  • From: Danilo
• Re: Opinions on Morton & Mayers PDE book?
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: concatenating orthogonal matrices
  • From: alexheld
• Re: matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Andreas
• Re: Opinions on Morton & Mayers PDE book?
  • From: Oliver Ruebenkoenig
• matrix and arbitrary precision math
  • From: Luciano
• finding optimal combination of matrices
  • From: Soeren Meyer-Eppler
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Harmonic Software
• Re: Opinions on Morton & Mayers PDE book?
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Badger
• Opinions on Morton & Mayers PDE book?
  • From: rcerlini11
• Re: concatenating orthogonal matrices
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Steven Lord
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Ronald Bruck
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: carlos
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: David N. Williams
• Re: symmetric tridiagonal eigenproblem
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• symmetric tridiagonal eigenproblem
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
  • From: deltaquattro
• Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
  • From: deltaquattro
• concatenating orthogonal matrices
  • From: alexheld
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Average values of interpolated values is calculus, right ?
  • From: john2
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Average values of interpolated values is calculus, right ?
  • From: Torsten Hennig
• Re: Average values of interpolated values is calculus, right ?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Mark Westwood
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: jasen
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: carlos
• Average values of interpolated values is calculus, right ?
  • From: richardchaven
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: dcorbit
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Sin & Cos speed worries
  • From: rgootee
• Re: What form of regularization is this?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: least squares error ellipse
  • From: iandjmsmith
• Re: ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 31, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: What form of regularization is this?
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: What form of regularization is this?
  • From: Brian Borchers
• What form of regularization is this?
  • From: spasmous
• Re: least squares error ellipse
  • From: John Herman
• ? approximates in different subspaces
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Polylogarithm
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: carlos
• Re: Polylogarithm
  • From: Badger
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: carlos
• Polylogarithm
  • From: Paul J Gans
• A FEA problem
  • From: St1234
• Re: Incomplete Beta function
  • From: lcw1964
• Re: Fouriere Series and Gibbs and Integration...
  • From: did
• Re: Slicing algorithm
  • From: jasen
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: jasen
• least squares error ellipse
  • From: jasen
• Re: Incomplete Beta function
  • From: jasen
• Re: Fouriere Series and Gibbs and Integration...
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Fouriere Series and Gibbs and Integration...
  • From: Michael
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: carlos
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Generating N! permutation
  • From: carlos
• Re: Generating N! permutation
  • From: john2
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: bv
• Re: Generating N! permutation
  • From: Ole Andersen
• Re: Generating N! permutation
  • From: David Langevin
• Generating N! permutation
  • From: Ari
• N-integrer Levi-Civita
  • From: Ari
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: A . L .
• Re: 2D slicing algorithm
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: ? helmholtz in inf domain
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: astanoff
• Re: ? helmholtz in inf domain
  • From: Peter
• Re: Full journal title?
  • From: Ian Gay
• Re: Piecewise constant approximation
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Re: Numerical diagonalization by not using zgeev?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: regarding pdes
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: schizoid_man
• Re: Numerical diagonalization by not using zgeev?
  • From: MWimmer
• Re: Numerical diagonalization by not using zgeev?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Full journal title?
  • From: S. Janssens
• regarding pdes
  • From: dibyadeep
• regarding pdes
  • From: dibyadeep
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: astanoff
• Re: Numerical diagonalization by not using zgeev?
  • From: MWimmer
• Re: FFTW understanding
  • From: stevenj
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: schizoid_man
• Re: Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: David Langevin
• Numerical double derivative and associated bond pricing problem
  • From: schizoid_man
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: sumitra . eecs
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: carlos
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: carlos
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Piecewise constant approximation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Piecewise constant approximation
  • From: rmn
• Re: 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Need Solution Method for Nonlinear ODE
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Piecewise constant approximation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Need Solution Method for Nonlinear ODE
  • From: alainverghote
• 3D Double Pendulum Simulation
  • From: sumitra . eecs
• Piecewise constant approximation
  • From: eru
• Re: ? helmholtz in inf domain
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Need Solution Method for Nonlinear ODE
  • From: Tom Irvine
• ? helmholtz in inf domain
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: A method to find a local minima
  • From: mathlover
• Re: ? tridiag sys with periodic bcs
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: 3-dim transformation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: A method to find a local minima
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: 2D Lagrangian interpolation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: convexity
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 24, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: 2D Lagrangian interpolation
  • From: deltaquattro
• Non-negative matrix factorization with probabilistic constraint
  • From: shna
• Re: convexity
  • From: Alex. Lupas
• Re: Incomplete Beta function
  • From: Georg Wenig
• Re: gram-schmidt orthogonal for numeric
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Powers of 2 - number theory
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Powers of 2 - number theory
  • From: D. Baruth
• Re: ? tridiag sys with periodic bcs
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• ? tridiag sys with periodic bcs
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Incomplete Beta function
  • From: lcw1964
• convexity
  • From: standshik
• Re: gram-schmidt orthogonal for numeric
  • From: OZ
• Re: gram-schmidt orthogonal for numeric
  • From: Gordon Sande
• 3-dim transformation
  • From: OZ
• gram-schmidt orthogonal for numeric
  • From: OZ
• Re: 2D Lagrangian interpolation
  • From: ~Glynne
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: A method to find a local minima
  • From: Badger
• A method to find a local minima
  • From: mathlover
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: Powers of 2 - number theory
  • From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Powers of 2 - number theory
  • From: Eddy
• 2D Lagrangian interpolation
  • From: deltaquattro
• Re: Optimization of noisy functions
  • From: John Herman
• Re: Help in identifying a numerical method
  • From: Don
• fuzzy multivariate
  • From: zagatov
• Re: Help in identifying a numerical method
  • From: highegg
• Help in identifying a numerical method
  • From: Don
• Possible to Find the Clusters One by One??
  • From: mathlover
• Re: Primality & Factoring
  • From: Gerry
• Re: Solving large-scale sparse binary linear systems EXACTLY?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Skunk
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: iandjmsmith
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: keez
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Roy Stogner
• ALA 2006 Dusseldorf (ILAS)
  • From: msustik
• Re: NASTRAN format
  • From: Rob McDonald
• Power Method and negative eigenvalues
  • From: Skunk
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: richard . koolhans
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: Robert Israel
• Best fit orthogonal basis for list of vectors
  • From: chengiz
• Re: NASTRAN format
  • From: Marko.J
• Re: jordan decomposition and generalized eigenvectors
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: jordan decomposition and generalized eigenvectors
  • From: Helmut Jarausch
• Re: jordan decomposition and generalized eigenvectors
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: ? types of LS
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• A problem about E(x|x>y)
  • From: Joe Zhang
• Re: ? types of LS
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• FFTW understanding
  • From: Blacky
• Re: An Interesting Subject
  • From: Paul O
• jordan decomposition and generalized eigenvectors
  • From: Jeremy Watts
• Re: Primality & Factoring
  • From: Gerry
• Re: ? types of LS
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: Incomplete Beta function
  • From: Georg Wenig
• ? types of LS
  • From: Cheng Cosine

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)