Re: Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
- From: deltaquattro@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 1 Aug 2006 06:51:54 -0700
deltaquat...@xxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
Hello,[..]
I must use Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation, as
described in [1], to interpolate the data of a known analytical field.
The field is 2D potential flow around a cylinder, with values taken at
the centers of a Cartesian grid. The interpolation is to the boundary
of the cylinder, that is, to a circle which cuts the Cartesian cells.
The error reduction with grid refinement is only first order, although
in [2] similar methods are reported to be nearly second order accurate.
Whoops! I forgot the references!
[1] Tseng, Y.-H., Ferziger, J. H., " A ghost-cell immersed boundary
method for flow in complex geometries", Journal of Computational
Physics 192 (2003) 593-623.
[2] Frink, N. T., "Tetrahedral Unstructured Navier-Stokes Method for
Turbulent Flows", AIAA JOURNAL, Vol. 36, No. 11, November 1998,
1975-1982.
Sorry for the omission,
Greetings,
deltaquattro
.
- References:
- Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
- From: deltaquattro
- Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
- Prev by Date: Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
- Next by Date: Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
- Previous by thread: Problems with Franke's inverse distance weighting interpolation
- Next by thread: symmetric tridiagonal eigenproblem
- Index(es):