Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: Gert Van den Eynde <gvdeynde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:49:08 +0200
Hi,
For comparison purposes: Maple 10 gives as a result
886.63804520290518897779 when a relative tolerance of 1e-20 was
requested using 150 digits fixed precision (I changed all your floating
point numbers in rationals). It selected adaptive Gaussian quadrature as
integration rule (Double Exponential quadrature failed).
bye,
gert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: Jean-Pierre Merlet
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- References:
- Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: axlq
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: axlq
- Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Prev by Date: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Next by Date: Re: Creating an matrix of possible combinations
- Previous by thread: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Next by thread: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Index(es):
Loading