Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: axlq@xxxxxxxxxxx (axlq)
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:29:36 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1155179110.659106.14960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mmm, this one is a bit wilder. Mathematica NIntegrate with target
precision of 6 fails with warning
NIntegrate::"ncvb": NIntegrate failed to converge to prescribed
accuracy after 7 recursive bisections in z near z = 0.00009765625
Yes, that happened to me also.
My Gauss Legendre gives -12190.6 to 6 places. I wonder if Maple can
confirm that value.
Gert Van den Eynde posted elsewhere in this thread that Maple got a
value of 866.something. Matlab gets the same result.
I didn't expect to build confidence in a result via voting from
different math softwares, but what else can I do? :)
-Alex
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: axlq
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: axlq
- Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- From: carlos
- Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Prev by Date: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Next by Date: Re: Sin & Cos speed worries
- Previous by thread: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Next by thread: Re: Definite integral with huge variations in magnitude
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|