sci.math.num-analysis

• Date Index

---

• A report by Bothe, Z. on Gaussian elimination., Carl Christian Kjelgaard Mikkelsen
• seri, luciferit
• Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint, shna
  • Message not available
    • Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint, shna
  • Message not available
    • Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint, shna
      • Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint, Peter Spellucci
• How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral, insect
  • Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral, Peter Spellucci
    • Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral, insect
  • Message not available
    • Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral, insect
• Index / dimension confusion in numerical recipes svdcmp, imutate
• Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf], schizoid_man
  • Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf], schizoid_man
    • Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf], Ioannis
      • Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf], schizoid_man
• ? LS and TLS calculation, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? LS and TLS calculation, Peter Spellucci
• Laplacle transform, Ruffe
  • Re: Laplacle transform, Badger
    • Re: Laplacle transform, Ruffe
    • Re: Laplacle transform, A . L .
      • Re: Laplacle transform, Ruffe
• A difficult slope., VCUE
  • Re: A difficult slope., Fred Krogh
    • Re: A difficult slope., Wolfgang Rave
• huge non-linear function minimization, Toussis Manolis
  • Re: huge non-linear function minimization, Hans Mittelmann
• Re: How to determine eigenvalues of a particular matrix, Sudarshan Raghunathan
  • Re: How to determine eigenvalues of a particular matrix, Ignoramus5425
• piecewise polynomial interpolation problem, smart0072000in
• Probability question, Fred Krogh
  • Re: Probability question, Robert Israel
    • Re: Probability question, Fred Krogh
• Round Robin Tournaments, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Round Robin Tournaments, dcorbit
    • Re: Round Robin Tournaments, Maury Barbato
• Large matrices in c++, Hottejonas
  • Re: Large matrices in c++, Sudarshan Raghunathan
• NUMAL library - Was it pulic domain?, HL
  • Re: NUMAL library - Was it pulic domain?, Ronald Bruck
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 25, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Generalized projections, W. F. Wang
  • Re: Generalized projections, israel
    • Re: Generalized projections, W. F. Wang
• EXPONENTS, russiandon
  • Re: EXPONENTS, Dave Dodson
• Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, virtualadepts
  • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, Fred Krogh
  • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, jacob navia
• tweaking for efficiency, toby989
  • Eigenvalues of sparse system, Oliver Ruebenkoenig
    • Re: Eigenvalues of sparse system, Peter Spellucci
  • Re: tweaking for efficiency, michael
    • Re: tweaking for efficiency, toby989
• An extreme challenge, W. F. Wang
• The Final Theory Of Everything V4.0, virtualadepts
• An interpolation question, Schizoid Man
  • Re: An interpolation question, jorge.alonsoortiz@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: An interpolation question, Jentje Goslinga
  • Re: An interpolation question, Olin Perry Norton
  • Re: An interpolation question, Bernard Danloy
    • Re: An interpolation question, jorge.alonsoortiz@xxxxxxxxx
• Measurable function in Real Alnalysis, lija gunaseelan
• The second difficult problem, W. F. Wang
  • Re: The second difficult problem, W. F. Wang
• how to build lapack ?, liushiyong
  • Re: how to build lapack ?, Sudarshan Raghunathan
    • Re: how to build lapack ?, W. F. Wang
• real analysis, lija gunaseelan
• numbers close to one, jsnX
  • Re: numbers close to one, Roy Stogner
    • Re: numbers close to one, Tim Peters
      • Re: numbers close to one, David W . Cantrell
• efficiency & nomenclature problem, Bernd . Schmitt . News
• Iterative Methods Library (IML++ with SparseLib++), S. Lankalalpalli
• Secant method vs Newton's method, Schizoid Man
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Richard Harter
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Robert Israel
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, DP
    • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Peter Spellucci
      • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, DP
    • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Bernard Danloy
    • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Peter Spellucci
      • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, John Herman
    • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Ron Shepard
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, arithmeticae
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Julian V. Noble
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Jentje Goslinga
    • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Bernard Danloy
      • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, Jentje Goslinga
  • Re: Secant method vs Newton's method, dcorbit
• Forurier analysis of data with jumps, Hottejonas
  • Re: Forurier analysis of data with jumps, Peter Spellucci
    • Re: Forurier analysis of data with jumps, Scott Seidman
• one difficult problem, W. F. Wang
  • Re: one difficult problem, Roy Stogner
    • Re: one difficult problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: one difficult problem, W. F. Wang
      • Re: one difficult problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: one difficult problem, W. F. Wang
      • Re: one difficult problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: one difficult problem, W. F. Wang
    • Re: one difficult problem, W. F. Wang
• 2D gaussian fit, verm25
  • Re: 2D gaussian fit, michael
    • Re: 2D gaussian fit, verm25
      • Re: 2D gaussian fit, michael
  • Re: 2D gaussian fit, Peter Spellucci
    • Re: 2D gaussian fit, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: 2D gaussian fit, verm25
• orthogonal complement, markeroon
  • Re: orthogonal complement, Peter Spellucci
    • Re: orthogonal complement, markeroon
  • Re: orthogonal complement, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: orthogonal complement, markeroon
  • Re: orthogonal complement, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: orthogonal complement, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: orthogonal complement, markeroon
      • Re: orthogonal complement, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: orthogonal complement, W. F. Wang
• formula solution of higher order polynomials, Steve Hawkwind
  • Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials, Steve Hawkwind
      • Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials, Steve Hawkwind
      • Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials, David W . Cantrell
• Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?, Joe Zhang
  • Re: Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?, Joe Zhang
• Lost poster, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Lost poster, Han . deBruijn
• A WorkLife FrameWork: a new application for Mathematica, dbreiss
• Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, mhill37
  • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Peter Spellucci
    • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Fred Krogh
      • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Peter Spellucci
      • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Fred Krogh
  • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Gert Van den Eynde
  • Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?, Tim Norfolk
• ANN: Invitation to beta test, Logic Scientific
• Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
  • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, Pierre Asselin
    • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
  • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, carlos
    • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
  • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, eltetot
    • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
  • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, spasmous
    • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
      • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, spasmous
      • Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?, yuanliu1
• ? grid for wave eqn, Cheng Cosine
• boundary conditions for numerical solution of diffusion equation, njc1001
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 18, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• proving theorem with Axioms, tom1
  • Re: proving theorem with Axioms, Dave Dodson
• Degree of a piecewise polynomial, Fijoy George
  • Re: Degree of a piecewise polynomial, Peter Spellucci
• interpolation problem, emailrohitarora
  • Re: interpolation problem, Fred Krogh
    • Re: interpolation problem, smart0072000in
      • Re: interpolation problem, Fred Krogh
      • Re: interpolation problem, smart0072000in
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data, Francis Burton
• Re: global unconstrained multidimensional optimization on reals?, Francis Burton
• Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Francis Burton
  • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Phil Sherrod
    • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Francis Burton
      • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Phil Sherrod
  • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Dov Bai
    • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Francis Burton
      • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Dov Bai
      • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Francis Burton
  • Message not available
    • Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization, Francis Burton
• function, Danilo
  • Re: function, Stephen Clark
  • Re: function, john2
    • Re: function, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: function, john2
      • Re: function, jacob navia
      • Re: function, jacob navia
      • Re: function, john2
      • Re: function, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: function, john2
      • Re: function, themos
      • Re: function, Carl Barron
• LCP-Path, Clockwork
  • Re: LCP-Path, Hans Mittelmann
• hamilton-jacobi using newton method, jj
• propability distritribution, Uwe Schmitt
  • Re: propability distritribution, john2
• solve equation, Schulle
  • Re: solve equation, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: solve equation, Robert Israel
  • Re: solve equation, michael
• A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?, shna
  • Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?, michael
    • Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?, shna
  • Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?, Carl Barron
• integration help, John
  • Re: integration help, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: integration help, John
  • Re: integration help, regis lebrun
    • Re: integration help, John
  • Re: integration help, Paul Abbott
  • Re: integration help, Julian V. Noble
    • Re: integration help, John
      • Re: integration help, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: integration help, John
• need help with proof of little conjecture, Bart
  • Re: need help with proof of little conjecture, Bart
• generating random permutations on the fly, regis lebrun
  • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, regis lebrun
  • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, Robert Israel
    • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, regis lebrun
      • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, Herman Rubin
      • Re: generating random permutations on the fly, regis lebrun
• Help with De-indexing Indexed Numbers, Slade
• exponent law practice, russiandon
  • Re: exponent law practice, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Newtons bucket - obvious confirmation of numerical, geometric nature of rotating masses, ivars . fabriciuss
• equation problem, quickcur
  • Re: equation problem, Ray Koopman
• complex financial problem, Ronin
• ? rank of large matrix, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? rank of large matrix, Steve Hawkwind
  • Re: ? rank of large matrix, Zeke Zeng
  • Re: ? rank of large matrix, Cheng Cosine
    • Re: ? rank of large matrix, Peter Spellucci
• Gauss-Kronrod and exactness, Axel Vogt
  • Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness, Joe
  • Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness, Fred Krogh
    • Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness, Axel Vogt
      • Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness, Fred Krogh
• Some solving problem on powell's method or Nelder Mead, glen
• error in Golub & Van Loan, Steve Hawkwind
  • Re: error in Golub & Van Loan, Allen McIntosh
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 11, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• More advanced QZ algorithm to transforming three matrices into upper-triangular ones ?, shna
  • Re: More advanced QZ algorithm to transforming three matrices into upper-triangular ones ?, shna
• Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions, roman . werpachowski
  • Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions, Robert Israel
    • Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions, Roman Werpachowski
  • Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions, A . L .
    • Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions, Roman Werpachowski
• Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?, shna
  • Re: Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?, jdturner
  • Re: Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?, carlos
• Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step' revisited, Steve Hawkwind
• Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., shna
  • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., carlos
    • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., shna
      • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., Peter Luschny
      • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., carlos
      • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., Peter Luschny
      • Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case ., carlos
• Least square approximation problem, LaMoRt
  • Re: Least square approximation problem, Hans Mittelmann
  • Re: Least square approximation problem, A . L .
    • Re: Least square approximation problem, LaMoRt
      • Re: Least square approximation problem, A . L .
      • Re: Least square approximation problem, LaMoRt
      • Re: Least square approximation problem, A . L .
      • Re: Least square approximation problem, LaMoRt
      • Re: Least square approximation problem, Jean
• Simplify expression?, mike
  • Re: Simplify expression?, dcorbit
• Latest version of LSODA..., fai391
  • Re: Latest version of LSODA..., max
• Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?, mike
  • Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?, Tom
  • Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?, Ioannis
  • Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?, Peter Spellucci
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?, mike
• Running Corrleations, crhras
  • Re: Running Corrleations, crhras
  • Re: Running Corrleations, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: Running Corrleations, crhras
• Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Steve Hawkwind
  • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Dave Dodson
    • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Steve Hawkwind
      • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Steve Hawkwind
      • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Peter Spellucci
      • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Steve Hawkwind
      • Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step', Steve Hawkwind
• matlab cholesky "out of memory", ahowe42
  • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Ray Koopman
    • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", ahowe42
  • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Gordon Sande
    • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", ahowe42
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Hans Mittelmann
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", andrew . howe
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Han de Bruijn
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", ahowe42
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Han de Bruijn
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Gordon Sande
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", ahowe42
      • Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory", Hans Mittelmann
• Quadratic Minimizer, Winston
  • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, dcorbit
    • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Martin Eisenberg
      • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Martin Eisenberg
      • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Julian V. Noble
      • Re: Quadratic Minimizer, Martin Eisenberg
• Sequence, Danilo
  • Re: Sequence, sirob
• Re: Rössler: chaos and numerical problems, Victor Castro
• Re: Preconditioning and regularization example, Bill Shortall
• sensitivity of eigenvalues, eltetot
  • Re: sensitivity of eigenvalues, WJ Suijlen
• Re: Question related to normal distribution, tryyourbestok
• An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran, mahmuud
  • Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran, Manny Feld
    • Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran, Steve Hawkwind
  • Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran, Tommi Höynälänmaa
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 04, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• NL Shrodinger equation solved with split step fourier method, Linda
  • Re: NL Shrodinger equation solved with split step fourier method, Tommi Höynälänmaa
• find peak of the the ECG signal, Jen
  • Re: find peak of the the ECG signal, John Herman
  • Re: find peak of the the ECG signal, Helmut Jarausch
    • Re: find peak of the the ECG signal, Jean
• Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Frane Saric
  • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Carl Barron
    • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Bernard Danloy
      • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Carl Barron
      • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Bernard Danloy
    • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Frane Saric
      • Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method", Bernard Danloy
• free mesh generator ?, Lasse.Karagiannis@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: free mesh generator ?, carlos
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a], Schizoid Man
• automatic finite difference discretization of a PDE, wijnandsuijlen
• Enhanced diffusion in isotropic 3D random walk monte-carlo, mvukovic
• Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question, mvukovic
  • Re: Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question, Ron Shepard
    • Re: Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question, mvukovic
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a], Bernard Danloy
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???, Michael Hennebry
  • Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???, Peter Luschny
    • Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???, Michael Hennebry
• Re: convergence rate of Incomplete Cholesy Conjugate Gradient, Hans Mittelmann
• Re: low precision exponential function, arnott
  • Re: low precision exponential function, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: low precision exponential function, Carl Barron
      • Re: low precision exponential function, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: low precision exponential function, Martin Brown
      • Re: low precision exponential function, arnott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: low precision exponential function, carlos
  • Re: low precision exponential function, Julian V. Noble
  • Re: low precision exponential function, Schizoid Man
    • Re: low precision exponential function, arnott
• Re: qfloat extended precision in Cephes library, lcw1964

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)