sci.math.num-analysis

• Thread Index

---

• A report by Bothe, Z. on Gaussian elimination.
  • From: Carl Christian Kjelgaard Mikkelsen
• seri
  • From: luciferit
• Re: An interpolation question
  • From: jorge.alonsoortiz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral
  • From: insect
• Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral
  • From: insect
• Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint
  • From: shna
• Re: Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint
  • From: shna
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Jentje Goslinga
• Re: An interpolation question
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: Laplacle transform
  • From: Ruffe
• Minimization of Matrix function with norm constraint
  • From: shna
• Re: Laplacle transform
  • From: A . L .
• Re: How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: ? LS and TLS calculation
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Round Robin Tournaments
  • From: Maury Barbato
• Re: A difficult slope.
  • From: Wolfgang Rave
• Re: Laplacle transform
  • From: Ruffe
• How to solve equation with varialbe included in integral
  • From: insect
• Re: Round Robin Tournaments
  • From: dcorbit
• Re: Laplacle transform
  • From: Badger
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: dcorbit
• Index / dimension confusion in numerical recipes svdcmp
  • From: imutate
• Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf]
  • From: schizoid_man
• Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf]
  • From: Ioannis
• Re: A difficult slope.
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf]
  • From: schizoid_man
• Evaluating integral of exp(-x) over [-inf, +inf]
  • From: schizoid_man
• Re: An interpolation question
  • From: Olin Perry Norton
• ? LS and TLS calculation
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Laplacle transform
  • From: Ruffe
• A difficult slope.
  • From: VCUE
• Re: NUMAL library - Was it pulic domain?
  • From: Ronald Bruck
• Re: huge non-linear function minimization
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• huge non-linear function minimization
  • From: Toussis Manolis
• Re: Generalized projections
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: An interpolation question
  • From: Jentje Goslinga
• Re: How to determine eigenvalues of a particular matrix
  • From: Ignoramus5425
• Re: How to determine eigenvalues of a particular matrix
  • From: Sudarshan Raghunathan
• piecewise polynomial interpolation problem
  • From: smart0072000in
• Re: Probability question
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: Probability question
  • From: Robert Israel
• Probability question
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Round Robin Tournaments
  • From: Maury Barbato
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: Large matrices in c++
  • From: Sudarshan Raghunathan
• Large matrices in c++
  • From: Hottejonas
• Re: Eigenvalues of sparse system
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• NUMAL library - Was it pulic domain?
  • From: HL
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 25, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: DP
• Re: tweaking for efficiency
  • From: toby989
• Re: Generalized projections
  • From: israel
• Generalized projections
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: verm25
• Re: EXPONENTS
  • From: Dave Dodson
• EXPONENTS
  • From: russiandon
• Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: An interpolation question
  • From: jorge.alonsoortiz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Final Theory Of Everything V6.0
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: tweaking for efficiency
  • From: michael
• Eigenvalues of sparse system
  • From: Oliver Ruebenkoenig
• tweaking for efficiency
  • From: toby989
• An extreme challenge
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: Lost poster
  • From: Han . deBruijn
• The Final Theory Of Everything V4.0
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Jentje Goslinga
• An interpolation question
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: The second difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Measurable function in Real Alnalysis
  • From: lija gunaseelan
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: John Herman
• Re: how to build lapack ?
  • From: W. F. Wang
• The second difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: how to build lapack ?
  • From: Sudarshan Raghunathan
• how to build lapack ?
  • From: liushiyong
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: arithmeticae
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: Forurier analysis of data with jumps
  • From: Scott Seidman
• Re: Forurier analysis of data with jumps
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• real analysis
  • From: lija gunaseelan
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: DP
• Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: numbers close to one
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• Re: numbers close to one
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: numbers close to one
  • From: Roy Stogner
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• numbers close to one
  • From: jsnX
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: Robert Israel
• efficiency & nomenclature problem
  • From: Bernd . Schmitt . News
• Iterative Methods Library (IML++ with SparseLib++)
  • From: S. Lankalalpalli
• Secant method vs Newton's method
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Forurier analysis of data with jumps
  • From: Hottejonas
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: one difficult problem
  • From: Roy Stogner
• Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: markeroon
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: markeroon
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: markeroon
• Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• one difficult problem
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: W. F. Wang
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: Gottfried Helms
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: spasmous
• Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: michael
• Re: formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: verm25
• Re: 2D gaussian fit
  • From: michael
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: spasmous
• 2D gaussian fit
  • From: verm25
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Re: orthogonal complement
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• orthogonal complement
  • From: markeroon
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Fred Krogh
• formula solution of higher order polynomials
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?
  • From: Joe Zhang
• Re: Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?
  • From: Robert Israel
• Is rosenbrock's function unimodal or multimodal?
  • From: Joe Zhang
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Gert Van den Eynde
• Lost poster
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: interpolation problem
  • From: smart0072000in
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: eltetot
• A WorkLife FrameWork: a new application for Mathematica
  • From: dbreiss
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: proving theorem with Axioms
  • From: Dave Dodson
• Re: interpolation problem
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Roots of High-Degree Polynomials: How Often Required?
  • From: mhill37
• ANN: Invitation to beta test
  • From: Logic Scientific
• Re: interpolation problem
  • From: smart0072000in
• Any recommendation on iterative solver?
  • From: yuanliu1
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Francis Burton
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Francis Burton
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: regis lebrun
• ? grid for wave eqn
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Degree of a piecewise polynomial
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: ? rank of large matrix
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• boundary conditions for numerical solution of diffusion equation
  • From: njc1001
• Re: function
  • From: themos
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 18, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: function
  • From: john2
• proving theorem with Axioms
  • From: tom1
• Re: interpolation problem
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Phil Sherrod
• Degree of a piecewise polynomial
  • From: Fijoy George
• Re: function
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: function
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: function
  • From: john2
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Dov Bai
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Francis Burton
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Francis Burton
• interpolation problem
  • From: emailrohitarora
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Dov Bai
• Re: Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Phil Sherrod
• Re: function
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: function
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Fitting my own curve for a set of data
  • From: Francis Burton
• Re: global unconstrained multidimensional optimization on reals?
  • From: Francis Burton
• Sum-of-squares vs function minimization
  • From: Francis Burton
• Re: function
  • From: john2
• Re: function
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: function
  • From: john2
• Re: function
  • From: Stephen Clark
• function
  • From: Danilo
• Re: ? rank of large matrix
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran
  • From: Tommi Höynälänmaa
• Re: Running Corrleations
  • From: crhras
• Re: LCP-Path
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• LCP-Path
  • From: Clockwork
• Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?
  • From: Carl Barron
• hamilton-jacobi using newton method
  • From: jj
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: integration help
  • From: John
• Re: integration help
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: integration help
  • From: John
• Re: integration help
  • From: John
• Re: propability distritribution
  • From: john2
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: regis lebrun
• propability distritribution
  • From: Uwe Schmitt
• Re: solve equation
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?
  • From: shna
• Re: ? rank of large matrix
  • From: Zeke Zeng
• Re: solve equation
  • From: michael
• Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Re: solve equation
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• solve equation
  • From: Schulle
• Re: A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?
  • From: michael
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness
  • From: Axel Vogt
• A matrix equation problem - AX - XB = CX^t C ?
  • From: shna
• Re: integration help
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: integration help
  • From: Paul Abbott
• Re: need help with proof of little conjecture
  • From: Bart
• Re: integration help
  • From: regis lebrun
• Re: integration help
  • From: John
• Re: integration help
  • From: David W . Cantrell
• integration help
  • From: John
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: regis lebrun
• need help with proof of little conjecture
  • From: Bart
• Re: generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• generating random permutations on the fly
  • From: regis lebrun
• Help with De-indexing Indexed Numbers
  • From: Slade
• Re: exponent law practice
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet
• exponent law practice
  • From: russiandon
• Re: equation problem
  • From: Ray Koopman
• Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness
  • From: Fred Krogh
• Newtons bucket - obvious confirmation of numerical, geometric nature of rotating masses
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• equation problem
  • From: quickcur
• complex financial problem
  • From: Ronin
• Re: ? rank of large matrix
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• ? rank of large matrix
  • From: Cheng Cosine
• Re: Gauss-Kronrod and exactness
  • From: Joe
• Re: Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?
  • From: carlos
• Re: Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?
  • From: jdturner
• Re: Running Corrleations
  • From: Duncan Muirhead
• Gauss-Kronrod and exactness
  • From: Axel Vogt
• Some solving problem on powell's method or Nelder Mead
  • From: glen
• Re: error in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Allen McIntosh
• error in Golub & Van Loan
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: carlos
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 11, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions
  • From: Roman Werpachowski
• Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions
  • From: Roman Werpachowski
• Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: Peter Luschny
• Re: More advanced QZ algorithm to transforming three matrices into upper-triangular ones ?
  • From: shna
• More advanced QZ algorithm to transforming three matrices into upper-triangular ones ?
  • From: shna
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: carlos
• Uniqueness of the solutions of difference equations in many dimensions
  • From: roman . werpachowski
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: Peter Luschny
• Solution of the matrix equation of AX + XB + CXD = E ?
  • From: shna
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: shna
• Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step' revisited
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: Jean
• Re: Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: carlos
• Re: Latest version of LSODA...
  • From: max
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: LaMoRt
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: LaMoRt
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: LaMoRt
• Aitken's method and Steffensen's method in multi-dimensional case .
  • From: shna
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: A . L .
• Re: Least square approximation problem
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Least square approximation problem
  • From: LaMoRt
• Re: NL Shrodinger equation solved with split step fourier method
  • From: Tommi Höynälänmaa
• Re: Sequence
  • From: sirob
• Re: Running Corrleations
  • From: crhras
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Re: Simplify expression?
  • From: dcorbit
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Simplify expression?
  • From: mike
• Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?
  • From: mike
• Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?
  • From: Ioannis
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: ahowe42
• Latest version of LSODA...
  • From: fai391
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?
  • From: Tom
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: ahowe42
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Han de Bruijn
• Cxx Smooth interpolating function that passes through the points?
  • From: mike
• Running Corrleations
  • From: crhras
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: andrew . howe
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: ahowe42
• Re: Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Dave Dodson
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Martin Eisenberg
• Golub/Van Loan's 'QZ step'
  • From: Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: ahowe42
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: Ray Koopman
• matlab cholesky "out of memory"
  • From: ahowe42
• Re: Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: dcorbit
• Quadratic Minimizer
  • From: Winston
• Sequence
  • From: Danilo
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: sensitivity of eigenvalues
  • From: WJ Suijlen
• Re: Rössler: chaos and numerical problems
  • From: Victor Castro
• Re: Preconditioning and regularization example
  • From: Bill Shortall
• sensitivity of eigenvalues
  • From: eltetot
• Re: An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran
  • From: Manny Feld
• Re: Question related to normal distribution
  • From: tryyourbestok
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Carl Barron
• An Interesting Animation About Holy Quran
  • From: mahmuud
• Re: find peak of the the ECG signal
  • From: Jean
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 04, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• NL Shrodinger equation solved with split step fourier method
  • From: Linda
• Re: find peak of the the ECG signal
  • From: Helmut Jarausch
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: find peak of the the ECG signal
  • From: John Herman
• find peak of the the ECG signal
  • From: Jen
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Frane Saric
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Carl Barron
• Efficiently computing matrix - getting rid of "power method"
  • From: Frane Saric
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• Re: free mesh generator ?
  • From: carlos
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Schizoid Man
• free mesh generator ?
  • From: Lasse.Karagiannis@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question
  • From: mvukovic
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x^2) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Schizoid Man
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Julian V. Noble
• Re: Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question
  • From: Ron Shepard
• automatic finite difference discretization of a PDE
  • From: wijnandsuijlen
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Enhanced diffusion in isotropic 3D random walk monte-carlo
  • From: mvukovic
• Random position on sphere generator -- numerics question
  • From: mvukovic
• Re: How to do Gaussian integration with exp(-x) weight function but finite range [0,a]
  • From: Bernard Danloy
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Martin Brown
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: Peter Luschny
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Carl Barron
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: carlos
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: (a+b)/2 does not belong to [a,b] ???
  • From: Michael Hennebry
• Re: convergence rate of Incomplete Cholesy Conjugate Gradient
  • From: Hans Mittelmann
• Re: low precision exponential function
  • From: arnott
• Re: qfloat extended precision in Cephes library
  • From: lcw1964

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)