Re: Write unambiguously grammar.?

From: akakiyakakievich@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:18:56 -0000

On 2 jul, 04:35, Trish <trinhnguyen...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can someone help. thanks
question:
<exp> ::= <int>|<exp> <op> <exp>
<op>::= + | *
is ambiguous. Rewrite the grammar so that it accepts the same language unambiguous and honors the traditional interpretation of arithmetic expressions.
Using your grammar, provide a derivation of the expressions:
2*3+5*4 and 2+3*5*4

try using ( ) parentheses in the grammar

.

References:
- Write unambiguously grammar.?
  - From: Trish

Prev by Date: Re: Segmentation fault in using cephes mathematical library's functions
Next by Date: Is there more stable mumerical package to calculate the condition number ?
Previous by thread: Re: Write unambiguously grammar.?
Next by thread: EBNF grammar, can someone help?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Write unambiguously grammar.?
... Rewrite the grammar so that it accepts the same language unambiguous and honors the traditional interpretation of arithmetic expressions. ...
(sci.math.num-analysis)
Re: Topicalization
... Two first class honors Carl wants among his senior sophister students ... Inversion is used in poetry ... (again, it's all about grammar, not about style...) ...
(alt.usage.english)