Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Sebastian Hanigk <hanigk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:18:25 +0200
Gordon Sande <g.sande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
There is a 2005 paper by Cohn, Kleinberg, Szegedy and Umans
(Group-theoretic algorithms for matrix multiplication) wherein they give
a minimal lower boundary of O(n^2), but this is a very academic result.
Since the answer is of size n^2 it does not seem to other than a trivial
statement that is often stated to remind foks that there will not be
either linear or n log ( n ) algorithms.
Obviously ;-)
Although they propose a construction scheme which has the possibility of
lowering the complexity exponent to 2, it's not really useful in
practice for more or less the same reasons Strassen's or
Coppersmith-Winograd's method is unsuitable.
Sebastian
.
- References:
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Victor Eijkhout
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Achille Talon
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Victor Eijkhout
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: no-spam
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Achille Talon
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Sebastian Hanigk
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- Prev by Date: all solutions team
- Next by Date: Re: Identifying Last Point Preceding Last Vertical Tangent in a Data Set
- Previous by thread: Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- Next by thread: Re: iterative vs. direct methods for linear systems
- Index(es):
Loading