Re: Vectorfield
- From: Oliver.Zind@xxxxxx (Oliver Zind)
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 06:33:14 GMT
forget it: you obviously don't have an ordered set of vectors and want
to interpolate between to successives, but you seem to have a unstructured set
of 3D vectors. the idea with RGB assumes you can associate the 3 values with
a pixel in a 2D area: again this means that you need some structure in this
vector set? so: what is the structure in this data set: i could guess
each vector represents a point of a surface in 3d?
The general idea is a transformation from one 3 dim space to an other
3 dim space. I want to transform real 3 dim datas which I measured to
target values. That means I measure a three dim datas and I have for
each data a target value where it have to be. It is to calibrate a
measurement system. You have real datas of a measurement of a
predefined target and you have the datas from a reference measurement.
So it is nothing else that a calibration. I tried several different
possibilities in the last months but I didn't find the 100% solution.
Now I thought, that a set of 3 dim real values and target values are
nothing else than a vector field. If it is possible to make a numeric
calculation of that vector field it will be possible to improve the
calibration.
It is "only" neccessary to find a way to calculate vectors which are
lying between other vector.
cu
Oliver
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vectorfield
- From: Peter Spellucci
- Re: Vectorfield
- References:
- Vectorfield
- From: Oliver Zind
- Re: Vectorfield
- From: Peter Spellucci
- Re: Vectorfield
- From: Oliver Zind
- Re: Vectorfield
- From: Peter Spellucci
- Vectorfield
- Prev by Date: solutions manual to calculus early trancsendentals edition 6
- Next by Date: Re: Solving a large sparse system with a single dense row/column?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vectorfield
- Next by thread: Re: Vectorfield
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
