Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Nicolas Neuss <lastname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:10:40 +0200
And to comment also on some other points:
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Non-pde problems ? Can you mention examples of these, please ?
Google for "AMG non-pde"
Well, I'd like to compare this with the existence of the Euler number e.
Numerical analists have found a series 1 + 1/2! + 1/3! + .. + 1/n! and
they have found a limit (1 + 1/n)^n and they have .. . But this author
has found that all of this numerical stuff boils down to a number e with
the property that ln(e) = 1 . What I mean to say is that my idealized MG
in one dimension has _essentially_ all the ingredients of "real" MG. And
I would hesitate to call this "narrow minded".
If it implies that "real multigrid" works only for M-matrices, then it is
narrow-minded.
[...] In short:
Nothing is more practical than a good theory.
Yes, if it is good.
Nicolas Neuss
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- References:
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Pierre Asselin
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Michel
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: toni . lassila
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Multigrid convergence
- Prev by Date: Re: Multigrid convergence
- Next by Date: Re: Multigrid convergence
- Previous by thread: Re: Multigrid convergence
- Next by thread: Re: Multigrid convergence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|