Re: Atomless Boolean Algebra
From: Michael J Hardy (mjhardy_at_mit.edu)
Date: 07/23/04
- Previous message: Stephen M. Fortescue: "Re: Does Coxeters' theorem on eutactic star addition hold "trivially" for diameters of CONCENTRIC SIMILAR polyhedra ?"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Atomless Boolean Algebra"
- Next in thread: K. P. Hart: "Re: Atomless Boolean Algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Jul 2004 20:40:41 GMT
William Elliot (marsh@agora.rdrop.com) wrote:
> Some questions arise for which I request your suggestions.
> Is this Boolean algebra incomplete?
> Is there an example showing its incompleteness?
> Is there a way to complete it?
Someone else answered much of this. I would add that
every Boolean algebra has a Dedekind completion.
Roman Sikorski has written a book on Boolean algebras
that gives an account of this.
Paul Halmos wrote _Lectures_on_Boolean_Algeras_, which
has two flaws:
(1) He says "non-atomic" (or maybe "nonatomic"?) instead
of "atomless". The word is confusing because it sounds
as if it means "not atomic". I think he got this from
the language of ergodic theory.
(2) In his section on completions, Lecture 21, he seems to
be under the impression that a Boolean algebra has
various non-isomorphic "completions", one of which is
"minimal". But even though he's got it wrong, one can
reconstruct the truth from what he wrote.
Halmos' book is generally very readable, and despite those
two flaws, a good way to learn this topic. -- Mike Hardy
- Previous message: Stephen M. Fortescue: "Re: Does Coxeters' theorem on eutactic star addition hold "trivially" for diameters of CONCENTRIC SIMILAR polyhedra ?"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "Atomless Boolean Algebra"
- Next in thread: K. P. Hart: "Re: Atomless Boolean Algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|